GAAVX vs. ATRFX
GAAVX (GMO Alternative Allocation Fund) and ATRFX (Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I) are both Multistrategy funds. Over the past 5 years, GAAVX returned 2.38%/yr vs 5.27%/yr for ATRFX. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GAAVX charges 0.61%/yr vs 1.77%/yr for ATRFX.
Performance
GAAVX vs. ATRFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAAVX achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly higher than ATRFX's 0.09% return.
GAAVX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 3.25%
- 1Y
- 13.95%
- 3Y*
- 5.68%
- 5Y*
- 2.38%
- 10Y*
- —
ATRFX
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 9.53%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 16.49%
- 3Y*
- 0.36%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 5.84%
GAAVX vs. ATRFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAAVX GMO Alternative Allocation Fund | 1.26% | 15.19% | -5.70% | 6.07% | 3.63% | -5.12% | -0.28% | 3.49% |
ATRFX Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I | 0.09% | 2.81% | -4.14% | 24.60% | -4.33% | 25.70% | 15.32% | 17.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAAVX and ATRFX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAAVX vs. ATRFX — Risk / Return Rank
GAAVX
ATRFX
GAAVX vs. ATRFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Alternative Allocation Fund (GAAVX) and Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I (ATRFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAAVX | ATRFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.17 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.20 | 0.76 | +3.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.83 | 2.26 | +9.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAAVX | ATRFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 0.84 | +1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.31 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.33 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
GAAVX vs. ATRFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAAVX drawdown since its inception was -9.59%, smaller than the maximum ATRFX drawdown of -35.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAAVX and ATRFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAAVX | ATRFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.59% | -35.17% | +25.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.39% | -22.53% | +19.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.73% | -35.17% | +27.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.59% | -35.17% | +25.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.18% | -14.63% | +11.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -8.76% | +5.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.20% | 7.61% | -6.41% |
Volatility
GAAVX vs. ATRFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GMO Alternative Allocation Fund (GAAVX) is 1.95%, while Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I (ATRFX) has a volatility of 3.50%. This indicates that GAAVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATRFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAAVX | ATRFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.95% | 3.50% | -1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.92% | 17.55% | -12.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.51% | 20.50% | -13.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.88% | 17.35% | -11.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.90% | 15.54% | -9.64% |
GAAVX vs. ATRFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAAVX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than ATRFX's 1.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAAVX vs. ATRFX - Dividend Comparison
GAAVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%, more than ATRFX's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATRFX Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I | 0.49% | 0.65% | 11.89% | 1.87% | 4.98% | 5.43% | 20.92% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.91% | 1.02% |
GAAVX GMO Alternative Allocation Fund | 8.67% | 8.78% | 0.00% | 5.18% | 0.91% | 4.10% | 2.41% | 2.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAAVX and ATRFX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATRFX has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to GAAVX (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAAVX dropped -9.59% vs ATRFX's -35.17%.
GAAVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GAAVX and ATRFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer