PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAAA.L vs. AGGG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAAA.L vs. AGGG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global AAA-AA Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GAAA.L) and iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist (AGGG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAAA.L achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly higher than AGGG.L's -0.28% return.


GAAA.L

1D
0.20%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.69%
1Y
1.91%
3Y*
3.95%
5Y*
-3.02%
10Y*

AGGG.L

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
-0.28%
6M
0.43%
1Y
2.20%
3Y*
3.42%
5Y*
-1.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAAA.L vs. AGGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GAAA.L
iShares Global AAA-AA Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.12%10.43%-5.07%8.26%-20.61%-8.76%12.37%4.92%-1.16%
AGGG.L
iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist
-0.28%8.06%-1.44%5.27%-15.93%-5.32%9.37%6.85%0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between GAAA.L and AGGG.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2018

0.85

The correlation between GAAA.L and AGGG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAAA.L vs. AGGG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAAA.L
GAAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
GAAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
GAAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

AGGG.L
AGGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
AGGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
AGGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAAA.L vs. AGGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global AAA-AA Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GAAA.L) and iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist (AGGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAAA.LAGGG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.08

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

0.63

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.98

1.66

-0.69

GAAA.L vs. AGGG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAAA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the AGGG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAAA.L and AGGG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAAA.LAGGG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

0.43

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

-0.26

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

0.05

-0.12

Drawdowns

GAAA.L vs. AGGG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAAA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, which is greater than AGGG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAAA.L and AGGG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAAA.LAGGG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.06%

-25.91%

-7.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.08%

-3.48%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.29%

-7.20%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.55%

-24.24%

-6.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.69%

-11.01%

-6.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.80%

-9.53%

-4.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

1.32%

+0.63%

Volatility

GAAA.L vs. AGGG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global AAA-AA Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GAAA.L) has a higher volatility of 2.52% compared to iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist (AGGG.L) at 1.74%. This indicates that GAAA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAAA.LAGGG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

1.74%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.61%

3.91%

+1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.23%

5.10%

+2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.91%

6.81%

+2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.96%

6.32%

+1.64%

GAAA.L vs. AGGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAAA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than AGGG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GAAA.L vs. AGGG.L - Dividend Comparison

GAAA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGGG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AGGG.L
iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist
3.16%2.97%2.74%2.01%1.55%1.33%1.46%1.62%0.96%
GAAA.L
iShares Global AAA-AA Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAAA.L and AGGG.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AGGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AGGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GAAA.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GAAA.L and 0.10% for AGGG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAAA.L and AGGG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer