G500.L vs. SMH.L
G500.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)) and SMH.L (VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - G500.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg), while SMH.L is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, G500.L returned 12.15%/yr vs 36.12%/yr for SMH.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. G500.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.L.
Performance
G500.L vs. SMH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
G500.L is traded in GBp, while SMH.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMH.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, G500.L achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly lower than SMH.L's 75.78% return.
G500.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- 6M
- 9.49%
- YTD
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 21.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.15%
- 10Y*
- —
SMH.L
- 1D
- -4.48%
- 1M
- -9.67%
- 6M
- 61.91%
- YTD
- 75.78%
- 1Y
- 121.85%
- 3Y*
- 52.56%
- 5Y*
- 36.12%
- 10Y*
- —
G500.L vs. SMH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G500.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) | 9.90% | 17.45% | 24.98% | 24.88% | -19.98% | 28.95% | 3.61% |
SMH.L VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF | 75.78% | 38.57% | 26.28% | 67.15% | -27.87% | 44.10% | 2.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between G500.L and SMH.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2020 | 0.71 |
The correlation between G500.L and SMH.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
G500.L vs. SMH.L — Risk / Return Rank
G500.L
SMH.L
G500.L vs. SMH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) (G500.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| G500.L | SMH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.48 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 8.50 | -5.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.68 | 28.48 | -17.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
G500.L vs. SMH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum G500.L drawdown since its inception was -25.20%, smaller than the maximum SMH.L drawdown of -36.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G500.L and SMH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| G500.L | SMH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.20% | -36.36% | +11.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.21% | -14.25% | +6.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.22% | -36.36% | +18.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.20% | -36.36% | +11.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -13.65% | +12.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.31% | -9.75% | +4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 4.26% | -2.22% |
Volatility
G500.L vs. SMH.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) (G500.L) is 2.79%, while VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L) has a volatility of 16.49%. This indicates that G500.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| G500.L | SMH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | 16.49% | -13.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.28% | 30.17% | -20.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.06% | 36.45% | -24.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 32.35% | -16.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 31.76% | -15.89% |
G500.L vs. SMH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
G500.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
G500.L vs. SMH.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither G500.L nor SMH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
G500.L and SMH.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, G500.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
G500.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.L.
G500.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SMH.L is Semiconductors. G500.L tracks Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg), while SMH.L tracks MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for G500.L and 0.35% for SMH.L.
Find the right allocation for G500.L and SMH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer