G1CD.DE vs. QDVF.DE
G1CD.DE (Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist) and QDVF.DE (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Energy Equities funds - G1CD.DE tracks the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation while QDVF.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, G1CD.DE returned 5.13%/yr vs 13.74%/yr for QDVF.DE. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. G1CD.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QDVF.DE.
Performance
G1CD.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, G1CD.DE achieves a 35.16% return, which is significantly higher than QDVF.DE's 32.71% return.
G1CD.DE
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 35.16%
- 6M
- 37.55%
- 1Y
- 83.64%
- 3Y*
- 5.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDVF.DE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 32.71%
- 6M
- 29.55%
- 1Y
- 43.90%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 21.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
G1CD.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G1CD.DE Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist | 35.16% | 28.09% | -22.10% | -13.60% | -7.76% |
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 32.71% | -2.67% | 9.20% | -3.70% | 40.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between G1CD.DE and QDVF.DE is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2022 | 0.20 |
The correlation between G1CD.DE and QDVF.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
G1CD.DE vs. QDVF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
G1CD.DE
QDVF.DE
G1CD.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (G1CD.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| G1CD.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.32 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.85 | 2.54 | +5.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.83 | 7.98 | +19.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| G1CD.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.90 | 1.82 | +2.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.28 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
G1CD.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum G1CD.DE drawdown since its inception was -64.00%, roughly equal to the maximum QDVF.DE drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G1CD.DE and QDVF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| G1CD.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.00% | -65.81% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.60% | -17.23% | +6.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.73% | -27.13% | -25.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.50% | -8.92% | -7.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.01% | -17.41% | -17.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 5.49% | -2.49% |
Volatility
G1CD.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (G1CD.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.16% compared to iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) at 7.70%. This indicates that G1CD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| G1CD.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.16% | 7.70% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.33% | 20.43% | -6.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.33% | 24.05% | -2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 26.95% | -1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 28.68% | -3.56% |
G1CD.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
G1CD.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVF.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
G1CD.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Dividend Comparison
G1CD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, while QDVF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G1CD.DE Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist | 1.52% | 2.08% | 1.37% | 0.70% | 0.09% |
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
G1CD.DE and QDVF.DE have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for G1CD.DE.
G1CD.DE tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation, while QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for G1CD.DE and 0.15% for QDVF.DE.
Find the right allocation for G1CD.DE and QDVF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer