G1CD.DE vs. JMLP.DE
G1CD.DE (Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist) and JMLP.DE (HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - G1CD.DE tracks the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation while JMLP.DE tracks the Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, G1CD.DE returned 5.13%/yr vs 24.31%/yr for JMLP.DE. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. G1CD.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for JMLP.DE.
Performance
G1CD.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, G1CD.DE achieves a 35.16% return, which is significantly higher than JMLP.DE's 27.39% return.
G1CD.DE
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 35.16%
- 6M
- 37.55%
- 1Y
- 83.64%
- 3Y*
- 5.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JMLP.DE
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 27.39%
- 6M
- 24.82%
- 1Y
- 24.53%
- 3Y*
- 24.31%
- 5Y*
- 23.96%
- 10Y*
- —
G1CD.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G1CD.DE Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist | 35.16% | 28.09% | -22.10% | -13.60% | -7.76% |
JMLP.DE HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF | 27.39% | -5.93% | 44.53% | 15.63% | 20.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between G1CD.DE and JMLP.DE is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2022 | 0.25 |
The correlation between G1CD.DE and JMLP.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
G1CD.DE vs. JMLP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
G1CD.DE
JMLP.DE
G1CD.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (G1CD.DE) and HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| G1CD.DE | JMLP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.22 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.85 | 2.22 | +5.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.83 | 6.04 | +21.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| G1CD.DE | JMLP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.90 | 1.30 | +2.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 1.35 | -1.28 |
Drawdowns
G1CD.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum G1CD.DE drawdown since its inception was -64.00%, which is greater than JMLP.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G1CD.DE and JMLP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| G1CD.DE | JMLP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.00% | -22.29% | -41.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.60% | -11.02% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.73% | -22.29% | -30.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.50% | -5.15% | -11.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.01% | -5.87% | -29.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 4.05% | -1.05% |
Volatility
G1CD.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (G1CD.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.16% compared to HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE) at 6.65%. This indicates that G1CD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMLP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| G1CD.DE | JMLP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.16% | 6.65% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.33% | 15.30% | -0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.33% | 18.80% | +2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 20.38% | +4.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 21.66% | +3.46% |
G1CD.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
G1CD.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JMLP.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
G1CD.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Dividend Comparison
G1CD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than JMLP.DE's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G1CD.DE Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist | 1.52% | 2.08% | 1.37% | 0.70% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JMLP.DE HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF | 2.77% | 3.38% | 5.41% | 11.39% | 11.27% | 14.07% | 8.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
G1CD.DE and JMLP.DE have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMLP.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMLP.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for G1CD.DE.
G1CD.DE tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation, while JMLP.DE tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for G1CD.DE and 0.40% for JMLP.DE.
Find the right allocation for G1CD.DE and JMLP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer