FZOMX vs. STBFX
FZOMX (Fidelity SAI Short-Term Bond Fund) and STBFX (Sextant Short Term Bond Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FZOMX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for STBFX.
Performance
FZOMX vs. STBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FZOMX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 4.86%
- 5Y*
- 2.31%
- 10Y*
- —
STBFX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FZOMX vs. STBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZOMX Fidelity SAI Short-Term Bond Fund | 0.82% | 5.51% | 4.71% | 5.21% | -3.71% | -0.69% | 0.37% |
STBFX Sextant Short Term Bond Fund | 0.28% | 4.92% | 3.87% | 3.79% | -4.16% | -1.09% | 0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between FZOMX and STBFX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2020 | 0.62 |
The correlation between FZOMX and STBFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FZOMX vs. STBFX — Risk / Return Rank
FZOMX
STBFX
FZOMX vs. STBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Short-Term Bond Fund (FZOMX) and Sextant Short Term Bond Fund (STBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FZOMX | STBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.89 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FZOMX | STBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | — | — |
Drawdowns
FZOMX vs. STBFX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FZOMX | STBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.28% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.27% | — | — |
Volatility
FZOMX vs. STBFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FZOMX | STBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.63% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.21% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.08% | — | — |
FZOMX vs. STBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FZOMX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than STBFX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FZOMX vs. STBFX - Dividend Comparison
FZOMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than STBFX's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZOMX Fidelity SAI Short-Term Bond Fund | 4.54% | 4.64% | 4.27% | 3.26% | 0.76% | 0.41% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STBFX Sextant Short Term Bond Fund | 2.61% | 3.17% | 2.77% | 1.84% | 1.04% | 1.07% | 1.60% | 1.75% | 1.47% | 1.30% | 1.06% | 1.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FZOMX and STBFX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FZOMX and STBFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer