FZOMX vs. FSHBX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FZOMX (Fidelity SAI Short-Term Bond Fund) and FSHBX (Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - FZOMX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Fidelity, while FSHBX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FZOMX returned 2.33%/yr vs 2.24%/yr for FSHBX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FZOMX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FSHBX.

Performance

FZOMX vs. FSHBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI Short-Term Bond Fund (FZOMX) and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZOMX achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly higher than FSHBX's 0.56% return.

FZOMX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 0.93%
• 6M: 1.28%
• 1Y: 4.07%
• 3Y*: 4.90%
• 5Y*: 2.33%
• 10Y*: —

FSHBX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 6M: 0.88%
• 1Y: 3.74%
• 3Y*: 4.78%
• 5Y*: 2.24%
• 10Y*: 2.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZOMX vs. FSHBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FZOMX Fidelity SAI Short-Term Bond Fund	0.93%	5.51%	4.71%	5.21%	-3.71%	-0.69%	0.37%
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund	0.56%	5.49%	4.73%	5.35%	-3.86%	-0.92%	0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FZOMX and FSHBX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2020	0.81

The correlation between FZOMX and FSHBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FZOMX vs. FSHBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZOMX

FZOMX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FZOMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FZOMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FZOMX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FZOMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FZOMX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

FSHBX

FSHBX Risk / Return Rank: 62
FSHBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FSHBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FSHBX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FSHBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FSHBX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZOMX vs. FSHBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Short-Term Bond Fund (FZOMX) and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FZOMX	FSHBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	1.85	+0.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.96	3.34	+0.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.44	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.71	3.52	+0.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.64	13.31	+3.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FZOMX vs. FSHBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZOMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the FSHBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZOMX and FSHBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FZOMX	FSHBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01	1.85	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.06	1.02	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.01	1.49	-0.48

Drawdowns

FZOMX vs. FSHBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZOMX drawdown since its inception was -6.12%, smaller than the maximum FSHBX drawdown of -8.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZOMX and FSHBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FZOMX	FSHBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.12%	-8.80%	+2.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.23%	-1.17%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.23%	-1.17%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.12%	-6.36%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-6.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-0.19%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.29%	-1.04%	-0.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.27%	0.31%	-0.04%

Volatility

FZOMX vs. FSHBX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity SAI Short-Term Bond Fund (FZOMX) and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) have volatilities of 0.63% and 0.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FZOMX	FSHBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.63%	0.64%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.50%	1.47%	+0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04%	1.97%	+0.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.21%	2.21%	0.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.09%	1.86%	+0.23%

FZOMX vs. FSHBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZOMX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FSHBX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FZOMX vs. FSHBX - Dividend Comparison

FZOMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, more than FSHBX's 4.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund	4.17%	4.26%	4.00%	3.00%	0.83%	1.04%	2.62%	2.13%	1.78%	1.27%	1.12%	0.88%
FZOMX Fidelity SAI Short-Term Bond Fund	4.53%	4.64%	4.27%	3.26%	0.76%	0.41%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FZOMX and FSHBX in my portfolio?

FZOMX and FSHBX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FZOMX or FSHBX?

FSHBX has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to FZOMX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZOMX dropped -6.12% vs FSHBX's -8.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FZOMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.