PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZILX vs. TIVFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZILX vs. TIVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) and American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund (TIVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZILX achieves a 13.24% return, which is significantly lower than TIVFX's 33.96% return.


FZILX

1D
-2.85%
1M
0.48%
YTD
13.24%
6M
13.24%
1Y
28.61%
3Y*
19.59%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*

TIVFX

1D
-4.64%
1M
0.23%
YTD
33.96%
6M
33.48%
1Y
58.12%
3Y*
25.36%
5Y*
11.04%
10Y*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZILX vs. TIVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FZILX
Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund
13.24%33.52%5.32%16.28%-15.96%8.19%11.06%21.69%-9.38%
TIVFX
American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund
33.96%36.15%3.73%15.43%-20.57%7.53%12.61%19.38%-12.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FZILX and TIVFX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2018

0.86

The correlation between FZILX and TIVFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZILX vs. TIVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZILX
FZILX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FZILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZILX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FZILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZILX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

TIVFX
TIVFX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TIVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
TIVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZILX vs. TIVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) and American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund (TIVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FZILXTIVFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.51

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

5.18

-2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.51

18.24

-7.73

FZILX vs. TIVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZILX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the TIVFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZILX and TIVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FZILX vs. TIVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZILX drawdown since its inception was -34.37%, smaller than the maximum TIVFX drawdown of -54.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZILX and TIVFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZILXTIVFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.37%

-54.21%

+19.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.24%

-11.69%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.47%

-23.99%

+10.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.87%

-36.31%

+6.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.85%

-4.64%

+1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.66%

-13.36%

+6.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

3.31%

-0.39%

Volatility

FZILX vs. TIVFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) is 7.02%, while American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund (TIVFX) has a volatility of 10.50%. This indicates that FZILX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZILXTIVFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

10.50%

-3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.81%

17.44%

-3.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.85%

20.49%

-4.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.77%

19.04%

-3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

17.69%

-0.28%

FZILX vs. TIVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZILX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than TIVFX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

FZILX vs. TIVFX - Dividend Comparison

FZILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, less than TIVFX's 6.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZILX
Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund
2.36%2.67%3.00%2.98%2.71%2.61%1.64%2.37%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TIVFX
American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund
6.59%8.82%10.23%1.66%1.39%3.65%0.34%1.69%1.37%1.28%1.57%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


FZILX and TIVFX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIVFX has higher volatility (10.50%) compared to FZILX (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZILX dropped -34.37% vs TIVFX's -54.21%.

TIVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZILX and TIVFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer