PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZIIX vs. FSPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZIIX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class I (FZIIX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZIIX achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than FSPGX's 8.60% return.


FZIIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
0.78%
6M
1.23%
1Y
5.86%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
1.19%
10Y*
2.07%

FSPGX

1D
-0.38%
1M
7.10%
YTD
8.60%
6M
7.98%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
25.53%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZIIX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FZIIX
Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class I
0.78%5.91%1.02%5.53%-7.05%0.93%4.46%6.47%1.15%4.51%
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
8.60%18.54%33.27%42.77%-29.17%27.57%38.46%36.38%-1.79%27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FZIIX and FSPGX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZIIX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZIIX
FZIIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FZIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FZIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPGX
FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZIIX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class I (FZIIX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FZIIXFSPGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.66

1.85

+0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.98

2.50

+1.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.32

+0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

1.76

+0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.63

5.90

+0.73

FZIIX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZIIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZIIX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FZIIXFSPGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

1.85

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.75

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.90

+0.12

Drawdowns

FZIIX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZIIX drawdown since its inception was -10.95%, smaller than the maximum FSPGX drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZIIX and FSPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZIIXFSPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.95%

-32.66%

+21.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-16.17%

+13.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.99%

-23.32%

+19.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.95%

-32.66%

+21.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-0.38%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.51%

-6.37%

+4.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

4.81%

-3.90%

Volatility

FZIIX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class I (FZIIX) is 0.86%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 3.32%. This indicates that FZIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZIIXFSPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

3.32%

-2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.74%

11.58%

-9.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18%

15.39%

-13.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.04%

21.49%

-18.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.22%

21.55%

-18.33%

FZIIX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZIIX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FZIIX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

FZIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than FSPGX's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.32%0.34%0.37%0.73%0.86%2.22%1.76%1.04%1.32%0.22%0.00%0.00%
FZIIX
Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class I
2.81%3.61%2.41%2.34%1.31%1.76%2.10%2.52%2.58%2.56%3.11%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


FZIIX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSPGX has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to FZIIX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZIIX dropped -10.95% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

FZIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZIIX and FSPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer