PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZIIX vs. FFRHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZIIX vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class I (FZIIX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZIIX achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than FFRHX's 2.16% return. Over the past 10 years, FZIIX has underperformed FFRHX with an annualized return of 2.07%, while FFRHX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.96% annualized return.


FZIIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
0.78%
6M
1.23%
1Y
5.86%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
1.19%
10Y*
2.07%

FFRHX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.16%
6M
2.80%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
7.68%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
4.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZIIX vs. FFRHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FZIIX
Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class I
0.78%5.91%1.02%5.53%-7.05%0.93%4.46%6.47%1.15%4.51%
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
2.16%5.47%7.10%12.63%-1.55%5.01%1.69%8.63%0.10%3.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FZIIX and FFRHX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2004

0.12

The correlation between FZIIX and FFRHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZIIX vs. FFRHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZIIX
FZIIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FZIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FZIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FFRHX
FFRHX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FFRHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFRHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFRHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FFRHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFRHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZIIX vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class I (FZIIX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FZIIXFFRHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.66

2.67

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.98

6.46

-2.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.99

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

5.81

-3.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.63

20.62

-13.99

FZIIX vs. FFRHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZIIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the FFRHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZIIX and FFRHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FZIIXFFRHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

2.67

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

1.92

-1.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

1.20

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

1.15

-0.14

Drawdowns

FZIIX vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZIIX drawdown since its inception was -10.95%, smaller than the maximum FFRHX drawdown of -22.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZIIX and FFRHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZIIXFFRHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.95%

-22.20%

+11.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-1.19%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.99%

-3.29%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.95%

-5.90%

-5.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.95%

-22.20%

+11.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

0.00%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.51%

-1.15%

-0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

0.34%

+0.57%

Volatility

FZIIX vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class I (FZIIX) has a higher volatility of 0.86% compared to Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) at 0.59%. This indicates that FZIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZIIXFFRHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

0.59%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.74%

1.71%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18%

2.35%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.04%

2.88%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.22%

4.14%

-0.92%

FZIIX vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZIIX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

FZIIX vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison

FZIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than FFRHX's 7.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
7.06%7.41%6.94%8.24%3.81%2.74%3.84%5.15%4.74%4.05%4.44%3.69%
FZIIX
Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class I
2.81%3.61%2.41%2.34%1.31%1.76%2.10%2.52%2.58%2.56%3.11%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


FZIIX and FFRHX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FZIIX has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to FFRHX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZIIX dropped -10.95% vs FFRHX's -22.20%.

FFRHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZIIX and FFRHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer