PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZIAX vs. NRK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZIAX vs. NRK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class A (FZIAX) and Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income (NRK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZIAX achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly lower than NRK's 7.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FZIAX has underperformed NRK with an annualized return of 1.59%, while NRK has yielded a comparatively higher 1.88% annualized return.


FZIAX

1D
-0.20%
1M
-1.66%
6M
-1.46%
YTD
-0.48%
1Y
3.02%
3Y*
2.93%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*
1.59%
ALL TIME*
2.48%

NRK

1D
-0.19%
1M
-3.05%
6M
5.59%
YTD
7.15%
1Y
18.50%
3Y*
7.05%
5Y*
-0.53%
10Y*
1.88%
ALL TIME*
3.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$2.56M$2.40M$2.73M

FZIAX vs. NRK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FZIAX
Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class A
-0.48%5.58%0.80%5.17%-7.11%0.70%4.21%6.21%0.91%4.25%
NRK
Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income
7.15%4.74%5.93%7.03%-21.84%6.24%4.08%21.43%-5.98%6.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FZIAX and NRK is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2004

0.27

Over the past year, FZIAX and NRK have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZIAX vs. NRK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FZIAX
FZIAX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FZIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FZIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

NRK
NRK Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
NRK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRK Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
NRK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRK Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FZIAX vs. NRK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class A (FZIAX) and Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income (NRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FZIAXNRKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.46

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

3.70

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.24

13.46

-10.21

FZIAX vs. NRK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the NRK Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZIAX and NRK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FZIAX vs. NRK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZIAX drawdown since its inception was -11.15%, smaller than the maximum NRK drawdown of -40.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZIAX and NRK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZIAXNRKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.15%

-40.18%

+29.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

-5.32%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.72%

-11.49%

+7.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.15%

-31.06%

+19.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.15%

-31.06%

+19.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.49%

-3.50%

+1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-8.14%

+6.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

1.46%

-0.33%

Volatility

FZIAX vs. NRK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class A (FZIAX) is 0.80%, while Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income (NRK) has a volatility of 2.22%. This indicates that FZIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZIAXNRKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.80%

2.22%

-1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.98%

6.95%

-4.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34%

8.52%

-6.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.06%

9.98%

-6.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.21%

10.34%

-7.13%

FZIAX vs. NRK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZIAX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than NRK's 2.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

FZIAX vs. NRK - Dividend Comparison

FZIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than NRK's 7.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZIAX
Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class A
2.41%3.30%2.19%2.10%1.15%1.53%1.86%2.27%2.35%2.31%2.83%2.05%
NRK
Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income
7.95%8.21%6.74%4.06%5.41%4.18%4.15%3.98%4.68%4.85%5.37%5.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


FZIAX and NRK have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRK has higher volatility (2.22%) compared to FZIAX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZIAX dropped -11.15% vs NRK's -40.18%.

NRK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZIAX and NRK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer