FZIAX vs. DFSMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FZIAX (Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class A) and DFSMX (DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, FZIAX returned 1.85%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for DFSMX. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FZIAX charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for DFSMX.

Performance

FZIAX vs. DFSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class A (FZIAX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZIAX achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than DFSMX's 0.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FZIAX has outperformed DFSMX with an annualized return of 1.85%, while DFSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.26% annualized return.

FZIAX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.62%
• YTD: 0.87%
• 6M: 1.11%
• 1Y: 5.82%
• 3Y*: 3.62%
• 5Y*: 0.99%
• 10Y*: 1.85%

DFSMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 0.95%
• 6M: 1.17%
• 1Y: 2.48%
• 3Y*: 2.71%
• 5Y*: 1.70%
• 10Y*: 1.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZIAX vs. DFSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FZIAX Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class A	0.87%	5.58%	0.80%	5.17%	-7.11%	0.70%	4.21%	6.21%	0.91%	4.25%
DFSMX DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio	0.95%	2.30%	2.84%	2.98%	-0.36%	-0.11%	0.83%	1.62%	1.22%	1.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FZIAX and DFSMX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2004	0.35

The correlation between FZIAX and DFSMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (3 years) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FZIAX vs. DFSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZIAX

FZIAX Risk / Return Rank: 62
FZIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FZIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FZIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FZIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
FZIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

DFSMX

DFSMX Risk / Return Rank: 99
DFSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
DFSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
DFSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
DFSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
DFSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZIAX vs. DFSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class A (FZIAX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FZIAX	DFSMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.64	4.16	-1.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.98	8.56	-4.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.72	4.46	-2.74
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	12.85	-10.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.09	76.74	-70.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FZIAX vs. DFSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is lower than the DFSMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZIAX and DFSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FZIAX	DFSMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.64	4.16	-1.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	2.18	-1.85
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	1.64	-1.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	1.79	-0.85

Drawdowns

FZIAX vs. DFSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZIAX drawdown since its inception was -11.15%, which is greater than DFSMX's maximum drawdown of -2.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZIAX and DFSMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FZIAX	DFSMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.15%	-2.66%	-8.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.97%	-0.20%	-2.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.05%	-0.49%	-3.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.15%	-1.66%	-9.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-11.15%	-1.69%	-9.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.16%	0.00%	-1.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.61%	-0.23%	-1.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	0.03%	+0.93%

Volatility

FZIAX vs. DFSMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class A (FZIAX) has a higher volatility of 0.91% compared to DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX) at 0.14%. This indicates that FZIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FZIAX	DFSMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.91%	0.14%	+0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.81%	0.37%	+1.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.22%	0.61%	+1.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.03%	0.79%	+2.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.20%	0.77%	+2.43%

FZIAX vs. DFSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZIAX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSMX's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

FZIAX vs. DFSMX - Dividend Comparison

FZIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than DFSMX's 2.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFSMX DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio	2.36%	2.08%	2.80%	1.94%	0.63%	0.19%	0.83%	1.22%	1.11%	0.95%	0.94%	0.95%
FZIAX Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class A	2.57%	3.30%	2.19%	2.10%	1.15%	1.53%	1.86%	2.27%	2.35%	2.31%	2.83%	2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FZIAX and DFSMX in my portfolio?

FZIAX and DFSMX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FZIAX or DFSMX?

FZIAX has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to DFSMX (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZIAX dropped -11.15% vs DFSMX's -2.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.16 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.