FZFLX vs. SWMCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund (FZFLX) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX).
FZFLX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 12, 2015. SWMCX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
FZFLX vs. SWMCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FZFLX vs. SWMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZFLX Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund | 2.68% | 10.76% | 15.52% | 17.75% | -15.62% | 20.40% | 19.78% | 31.96% | -9.25% | 0.76% |
SWMCX Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund | -1.32% | 10.54% | 15.28% | 17.20% | -17.31% | 22.55% | 17.03% | 30.46% | -9.16% | 0.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FZFLX achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly higher than SWMCX's -1.32% return.
FZFLX
- 1D
- -2.75%
- 1M
- -9.45%
- YTD
- 2.68%
- 6M
- 4.85%
- 1Y
- 21.13%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- 7.49%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
SWMCX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -7.73%
- YTD
- -1.32%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- 12.94%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- 6.67%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FZFLX vs. SWMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FZFLX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SWMCX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FZFLX vs. SWMCX — Risk / Return Rank
FZFLX
SWMCX
FZFLX vs. SWMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund (FZFLX) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FZFLX | SWMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 0.72 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 1.12 | +0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.16 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 0.86 | +0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.41 | 4.04 | +1.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FZFLX | SWMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 0.72 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.37 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.45 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between FZFLX and SWMCX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FZFLX vs. SWMCX - Dividend Comparison
FZFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 56.26%, more than SWMCX's 2.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZFLX Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund | 56.26% | 57.77% | 10.20% | 2.35% | 79.79% | 50.77% | 7.19% | 6.49% | 7.69% | 1.68% | 0.93% | 0.67% |
SWMCX Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund | 2.15% | 2.13% | 2.60% | 1.49% | 1.59% | 2.93% | 1.45% | 2.44% | 1.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FZFLX vs. SWMCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FZFLX drawdown since its inception was -42.03%, roughly equal to the maximum SWMCX drawdown of -40.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZFLX and SWMCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FZFLX | SWMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.03% | -40.34% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.54% | -13.43% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.77% | -26.09% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.68% | -8.15% | -2.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -6.75% | +0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 2.87% | +0.49% |
Volatility
FZFLX vs. SWMCX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund (FZFLX) has a higher volatility of 10.12% compared to Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX) at 4.80%. This indicates that FZFLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FZFLX | SWMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.12% | 4.80% | +5.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.61% | 10.19% | +5.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.87% | 18.96% | +4.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.66% | 18.23% | +2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 20.76% | +0.09% |