PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZAOX vs. SWSSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZAOX vs. SWSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class Z (FZAOX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FZAOX having a 18.58% return and SWSSX slightly higher at 18.71%. Over the past 10 years, FZAOX has underperformed SWSSX with an annualized return of 10.33%, while SWSSX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.20% annualized return.


FZAOX

1D
1.01%
1M
3.00%
YTD
18.58%
6M
16.79%
1Y
38.08%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
6.81%
10Y*
10.33%

SWSSX

1D
0.92%
1M
5.00%
YTD
18.71%
6M
17.43%
1Y
41.24%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
6.65%
10Y*
11.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZAOX vs. SWSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FZAOX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class Z
18.58%12.25%-0.46%18.75%-20.39%31.71%17.62%32.92%-16.11%14.26%
SWSSX
Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares
18.71%12.88%11.57%17.07%-20.43%14.77%20.12%25.63%-11.19%14.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FZAOX and SWSSX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2013

0.96

The correlation between FZAOX and SWSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZAOX vs. SWSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZAOX
FZAOX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FZAOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZAOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZAOX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FZAOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZAOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

SWSSX
SWSSX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SWSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SWSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZAOX vs. SWSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class Z (FZAOX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FZAOXSWSSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.37

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

3.97

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.45

14.11

+2.35

FZAOX vs. SWSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZAOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the SWSSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZAOX and SWSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FZAOXSWSSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.28

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.30

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.47

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.36

+0.11

Drawdowns

FZAOX vs. SWSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZAOX drawdown since its inception was -40.41%, smaller than the maximum SWSSX drawdown of -60.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAOX and SWSSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZAOXSWSSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.41%

-60.34%

+19.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.31%

-11.00%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.21%

-27.50%

-6.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.21%

-31.93%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.41%

-41.81%

+1.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-0.13%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.36%

-10.73%

+2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

3.09%

-0.62%

Volatility

FZAOX vs. SWSSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class Z (FZAOX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) have volatilities of 5.56% and 5.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZAOXSWSSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

5.61%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.05%

13.60%

-0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.67%

19.15%

-1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.00%

22.59%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.92%

24.09%

-2.17%

FZAOX vs. SWSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZAOX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than SWSSX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FZAOX vs. SWSSX - Dividend Comparison

FZAOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than SWSSX's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZAOX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class Z
1.36%1.61%0.00%1.16%4.61%9.90%2.38%3.53%13.09%12.80%2.61%7.78%
SWSSX
Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares
1.08%1.29%1.66%1.49%1.32%8.88%2.55%6.12%10.45%5.22%4.10%6.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FZAOX and SWSSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWSSX has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to FZAOX (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZAOX dropped -40.41% vs SWSSX's -60.34%.

FZAOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZAOX and SWSSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer