FZAMX vs. FSKAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX).
FZAMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 13, 2013. FSKAX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
FZAMX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FZAMX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z | 1.33% | 12.00% | 17.39% | 15.15% | -14.70% | 25.40% | 18.84% | 23.85% | -14.85% | 20.78% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | -6.77% | 17.06% | 23.89% | 26.12% | -19.53% | 25.66% | 20.79% | 30.92% | -5.32% | 20.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FZAMX achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly higher than FSKAX's -6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FZAMX has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 10.76%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.
FZAMX
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- -8.81%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 5.63%
- 1Y
- 21.86%
- 3Y*
- 14.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
FSKAX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- YTD
- -6.77%
- 6M
- -4.56%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FZAMX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FZAMX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FZAMX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank
FZAMX
FSKAX
FZAMX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FZAMX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 0.83 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 1.29 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.19 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 1.04 | +0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.87 | 5.05 | +0.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FZAMX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.83 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.59 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.72 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.78 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between FZAMX and FSKAX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FZAMX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison
FZAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.96%, more than FSKAX's 1.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z | 6.96% | 10.09% | 6.93% | 2.83% | 5.86% | 18.58% | 1.41% | 3.50% | 10.72% | 7.81% | 5.00% | 4.90% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 1.09% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
FZAMX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FZAMX drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAMX and FSKAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FZAMX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.32% | -35.01% | -7.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.82% | -12.42% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.24% | -25.39% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.32% | -35.01% | -7.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.77% | -8.92% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.14% | -4.05% | -2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 2.57% | +0.77% |
Volatility
FZAMX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) has a higher volatility of 7.69% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 4.42%. This indicates that FZAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FZAMX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.69% | 4.42% | +3.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.44% | 9.40% | +4.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.07% | 18.50% | +3.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 17.38% | +2.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 18.42% | +2.43% |