FYX vs. SCDS
FYX (First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund) and SCDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. FYX is passively managed, while SCDS is actively managed. Over the past year, FYX returned 47.95% vs 46.17% for SCDS. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FYX charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SCDS.
Performance
FYX vs. SCDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FYX achieves a 19.73% return, which is significantly lower than SCDS's 23.60% return.
FYX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 19.73%
- 6M
- 21.82%
- 1Y
- 47.95%
- 3Y*
- 20.55%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
SCDS
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 6.33%
- YTD
- 23.60%
- 6M
- 24.35%
- 1Y
- 46.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FYX vs. SCDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 19.73% | 12.68% | 9.90% |
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF | 23.60% | 11.27% | 7.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between FYX and SCDS is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between FYX and SCDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
FYX vs. SCDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FYX
SCDS
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
FYX
SCDS
Industrials
FYX
SCDS
Healthcare
FYX
SCDS
Consumer Cyclical
FYX
SCDS
Technology
FYX
SCDS
Real Estate
FYX
SCDS
Energy
FYX
SCDS
Consumer Defensive
FYX
SCDS
Basic Materials
FYX
SCDS
Communication Services
FYX
SCDS
Utilities
FYX
SCDS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FYX vs. SCDS — Risk / Return Rank
FYX
SCDS
FYX vs. SCDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FYX | SCDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.64 | 2.55 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.73 | 3.55 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.43 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.28 | 5.25 | +1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.31 | 18.30 | +2.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FYX | SCDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 2.55 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 1.14 | -0.77 |
Drawdowns
FYX vs. SCDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FYX drawdown since its inception was -61.80%, which is greater than SCDS's maximum drawdown of -26.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYX and SCDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FYX | SCDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.80% | -26.71% | -35.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.56% | -8.85% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | 0.00% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.89% | -5.29% | -5.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 2.54% | -0.20% |
Volatility
FYX vs. SCDS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) is 4.60%, while JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that FYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FYX | SCDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 5.53% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.96% | 12.97% | -1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.22% | 18.18% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 21.22% | +0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.21% | 21.22% | +2.99% |
FYX vs. SCDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FYX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than SCDS's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
FYX vs. SCDS - Dividend Comparison
FYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than SCDS's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 0.68% | 0.64% | 1.62% | 1.22% | 0.95% | 0.99% | 0.65% | 1.12% | 1.08% | 0.60% | 0.94% | 0.88% |
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF | 0.91% | 1.15% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, FYX and SCDS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCDS has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to FYX (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYX dropped -61.80% vs SCDS's -26.71%.
On 1-year performance, FYX leads with 47.95% vs 46.17% for SCDS. On fees, SCDS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, FYX has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FYX has performed better with a 47.95% return vs 46.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCDS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FYX.
SCDS has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.68% for FYX.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FYX and 0.40% for SCDS.
FYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FYX and SCDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer