FYX vs. ROSC
FYX (First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund) and ROSC (Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - FYX tracks the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index while ROSC tracks the ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FYX returned 13.06%/yr vs 11.36%/yr for ROSC. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FYX charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for ROSC.
Performance
FYX vs. ROSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FYX achieves a 22.94% return, which is significantly higher than ROSC's 16.64% return. Over the past 10 years, FYX has outperformed ROSC with an annualized return of 13.06%, while ROSC has yielded a comparatively lower 11.36% annualized return.
FYX
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 22.94%
- 6M
- 20.86%
- 1Y
- 47.16%
- 3Y*
- 22.06%
- 5Y*
- 9.19%
- 10Y*
- 13.06%
ROSC
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 16.64%
- 6M
- 14.85%
- 1Y
- 34.90%
- 3Y*
- 17.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
FYX vs. ROSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 22.94% | 12.68% | 12.22% | 18.30% | -18.41% | 27.43% | 19.48% | 21.32% | -10.64% | 14.34% |
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 16.64% | 10.18% | 7.28% | 18.88% | -10.58% | 31.37% | 5.27% | 17.09% | -12.38% | 24.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between FYX and ROSC is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2015 | 0.85 |
The correlation between FYX and ROSC shifts across timeframes, from 0.85 (all time) to 0.95 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FYX vs. ROSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FYX
ROSC
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
FYX
ROSC
Industrials
FYX
ROSC
Healthcare
FYX
ROSC
Technology
FYX
ROSC
Consumer Cyclical
FYX
ROSC
Real Estate
FYX
ROSC
Energy
FYX
ROSC
Consumer Defensive
FYX
ROSC
Basic Materials
FYX
ROSC
Communication Services
FYX
ROSC
Utilities
FYX
ROSC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FYX vs. ROSC — Risk / Return Rank
FYX
ROSC
FYX vs. ROSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FYX | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.40 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.27 | 4.52 | +1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.40 | 14.75 | +5.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FYX vs. ROSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FYX drawdown since its inception was -61.80%, which is greater than ROSC's maximum drawdown of -43.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYX and ROSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FYX | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.80% | -43.13% | -18.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.56% | -7.75% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.91% | -23.74% | -4.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.91% | -23.74% | -4.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.82% | -43.13% | -5.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.33% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.86% | -7.18% | -3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 2.37% | -0.05% |
Volatility
FYX vs. ROSC - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) at 3.54%. This indicates that FYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FYX | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 3.54% | +1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.29% | 10.40% | +1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.42% | 15.53% | +2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 19.29% | +2.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.20% | 20.24% | +3.96% |
FYX vs. ROSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FYX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than ROSC's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
FYX vs. ROSC - Dividend Comparison
FYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than ROSC's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 0.67% | 0.64% | 1.62% | 1.22% | 0.95% | 0.99% | 0.65% | 1.12% | 1.08% | 0.60% | 0.94% | 0.88% |
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 1.79% | 2.08% | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.51% | 2.13% | 1.75% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 2.13% | 2.20% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, FYX and ROSC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FYX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to ROSC (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYX dropped -61.80% vs ROSC's -43.13%.
On 10-year performance, FYX leads with 13.06% vs 11.36% for ROSC. On fees, ROSC is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, ROSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FYX has performed better with a 13.06% return vs 11.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROSC is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FYX.
ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.67% for FYX.
FYX tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index, while ROSC tracks ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FYX and 0.34% for ROSC.
FYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FYX and ROSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer