FYLD vs. XSD
FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) and XSD (SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FYLD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while XSD is a Semiconductors fund tracking the S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index. FYLD is actively managed, while XSD is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FYLD returned 12.08%/yr vs 30.26%/yr for XSD. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FYLD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XSD.
Performance
FYLD vs. XSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FYLD achieves a 19.96% return, which is significantly lower than XSD's 88.46% return. Over the past 10 years, FYLD has underperformed XSD with an annualized return of 12.08%, while XSD has yielded a comparatively higher 30.26% annualized return.
FYLD
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 19.96%
- 6M
- 20.90%
- 1Y
- 38.49%
- 3Y*
- 22.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
XSD
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- 88.46%
- 6M
- 84.83%
- 1Y
- 147.81%
- 3Y*
- 40.43%
- 5Y*
- 27.60%
- 10Y*
- 30.26%
FYLD vs. XSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 19.96% | 34.53% | 3.00% | 13.18% | -5.53% | 18.67% | 4.17% | 17.83% | -14.47% | 29.81% |
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 88.46% | 29.85% | 10.75% | 34.87% | -30.92% | 42.54% | 61.95% | 64.66% | -6.35% | 25.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between FYLD and XSD is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2013 | 0.50 |
The correlation between FYLD and XSD shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FYLD vs. XSD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FYLD
XSD
Energy
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Energy
FYLD
XSD
Financial Services
FYLD
XSD
-
Industrials
FYLD
XSD
-
Basic Materials
FYLD
XSD
-
Consumer Cyclical
FYLD
XSD
-
Consumer Defensive
FYLD
XSD
-
Technology
FYLD
XSD
Communication Services
FYLD
XSD
-
Utilities
FYLD
XSD
-
Healthcare
FYLD
-
XSD
-
Real Estate
FYLD
-
XSD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FYLD vs. XSD — Risk / Return Rank
FYLD
XSD
FYLD vs. XSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FYLD | XSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.53 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.11 | 7.99 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.06 | 26.64 | -1.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FYLD vs. XSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FYLD drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, smaller than the maximum XSD drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYLD and XSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FYLD | XSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.55% | -64.56% | +20.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.44% | -18.61% | +13.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.15% | -41.25% | +26.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.12% | -42.27% | +17.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.55% | -42.27% | -2.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -6.77% | +6.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.81% | -13.73% | +4.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | 5.57% | -4.03% |
Volatility
FYLD vs. XSD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) is 3.71%, while SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) has a volatility of 20.05%. This indicates that FYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FYLD | XSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 20.05% | -16.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | 31.79% | -22.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.82% | 39.14% | -27.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 38.80% | -22.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 35.26% | -17.25% |
FYLD vs. XSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FYLD vs. XSD - Dividend Comparison
FYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than XSD's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 3.60% | 4.07% | 5.41% | 6.06% | 6.13% | 4.74% | 3.94% | 3.73% | 5.17% | 2.85% | 2.72% | 3.98% |
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.20% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.10% | 0.26% | 0.51% | 1.16% | 0.59% | 0.64% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FYLD and XSD have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSD has higher volatility (20.05%) compared to FYLD (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYLD dropped -44.55% vs XSD's -64.56%.
On 10-year performance, XSD leads with 30.26% vs 12.08% for FYLD. On fees, XSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XSD has performed better with a 30.26% return vs 12.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FYLD.
FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 0.13% for XSD.
FYLD is categorized as Global Equities, while XSD is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FYLD and 0.35% for XSD.
XSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs 3.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FYLD and XSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer