PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYLD vs. TRTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYLD vs. TRTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYLD achieves a 18.73% return, which is significantly higher than TRTY's 10.56% return.


FYLD

1D
0.42%
1M
0.10%
YTD
18.73%
6M
21.10%
1Y
39.47%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
11.56%
10Y*
11.37%

TRTY

1D
0.53%
1M
1.01%
YTD
10.56%
6M
12.12%
1Y
24.27%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYLD vs. TRTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FYLD
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
18.73%34.53%3.00%13.18%-5.53%18.67%4.17%17.83%-9.98%
TRTY
Cambria Trinity ETF
10.56%16.35%3.89%3.97%-3.30%15.73%1.68%8.36%-5.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FYLD and TRTY is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018

0.68

The correlation between FYLD and TRTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

FYLD vs. TRTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FYLD
TRTY

Energy

32.7%
18.2%

Financial Services

18.9%
15.8%

Industrials

16.1%
13.4%

Basic Materials

9.4%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
3.8%

Technology

4.2%
7.7%

Communication Services

4.1%
3.9%

Utilities

1.8%
6.9%

Healthcare

-

2.6%

Real Estate

-

8.7%

Energy

FYLD
32.7%
TRTY
18.2%

Financial Services

FYLD
18.9%
TRTY
15.8%

Industrials

FYLD
16.1%
TRTY
13.4%

Basic Materials

FYLD
9.4%
TRTY
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FYLD
7.3%
TRTY
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

FYLD
5.7%
TRTY
3.8%

Technology

FYLD
4.2%
TRTY
7.7%

Communication Services

FYLD
4.1%
TRTY
3.9%

Utilities

FYLD
1.8%
TRTY
6.9%

Healthcare

FYLD

-

TRTY
2.6%

Real Estate

FYLD

-

TRTY
8.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYLD vs. TRTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYLD
FYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

TRTY
TRTY Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
TRTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRTY Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
TRTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRTY Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYLD vs. TRTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FYLDTRTYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.45

2.56

+0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.72

3.23

+1.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.52

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.66

4.55

+3.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

27.50

18.83

+8.67

FYLD vs. TRTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYLD Sharpe Ratio is 3.45, which is higher than the TRTY Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYLD and TRTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FYLDTRTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.45

2.56

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.57

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.62

-0.16

Drawdowns

FYLD vs. TRTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYLD drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, which is greater than TRTY's maximum drawdown of -22.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYLD and TRTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYLDTRTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.55%

-22.35%

-22.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.44%

-5.49%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.15%

-9.25%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

-13.72%

-11.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-0.21%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.83%

-4.17%

-4.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

1.32%

+0.19%

Volatility

FYLD vs. TRTY - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) at 2.34%. This indicates that FYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYLDTRTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

2.34%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.77%

8.24%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

9.54%

+2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.23%

10.62%

+5.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

10.41%

+7.63%

FYLD vs. TRTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than TRTY's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

FYLD vs. TRTY - Dividend Comparison

FYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than TRTY's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYLD
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
3.64%4.07%5.41%6.06%6.13%4.74%3.94%3.73%5.17%2.85%2.72%3.98%
TRTY
Cambria Trinity ETF
2.99%2.86%3.55%3.24%5.17%4.52%1.99%2.64%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FYLD and TRTY have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FYLD has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to TRTY (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYLD dropped -44.55% vs TRTY's -22.35%.

On 5-year performance, FYLD leads with 11.56% vs 6.06% for TRTY. On fees, TRTY is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, TRTY has been the lower-risk option at 2.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FYLD has performed better with a 11.56% return vs 6.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TRTY is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FYLD.

FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 2.99% for TRTY.

FYLD is categorized as Global Equities, while TRTY is Tactical Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FYLD and 0.44% for TRTY.

FYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYLD and TRTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer