FYLD vs. TAIL
FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) and TAIL (Cambria Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FYLD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while TAIL is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FYLD returned 11.56%/yr vs -8.35%/yr for TAIL. At a correlation of -0.49, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.
Performance
FYLD vs. TAIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FYLD achieves a 18.73% return, which is significantly higher than TAIL's -6.13% return.
FYLD
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 18.73%
- 6M
- 21.10%
- 1Y
- 39.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- 11.56%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
TAIL
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- YTD
- -6.13%
- 6M
- -7.50%
- 1Y
- -8.69%
- 3Y*
- -5.75%
- 5Y*
- -8.35%
- 10Y*
- —
FYLD vs. TAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 18.73% | 34.53% | 3.00% | 13.18% | -5.53% | 18.67% | 4.17% | 17.83% | -14.47% | 12.84% |
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | -6.13% | 5.48% | -9.62% | -13.29% | -13.13% | -12.81% | 6.91% | -14.27% | 2.85% | -7.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between FYLD and TAIL is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017 | -0.49 |
The correlation between FYLD and TAIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.49 (all time) to -0.28 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FYLD vs. TAIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FYLD
TAIL
Energy
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Utilities
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
FYLD
TAIL
Financial Services
FYLD
TAIL
Industrials
FYLD
TAIL
Basic Materials
FYLD
TAIL
Consumer Cyclical
FYLD
TAIL
Consumer Defensive
FYLD
TAIL
Technology
FYLD
TAIL
Communication Services
FYLD
TAIL
Utilities
FYLD
TAIL
Healthcare
FYLD
-
TAIL
Real Estate
FYLD
-
TAIL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FYLD vs. TAIL — Risk / Return Rank
FYLD
TAIL
FYLD vs. TAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FYLD | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.45 | -1.04 | +4.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.72 | -1.48 | +6.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 0.83 | +0.79 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.66 | -0.81 | +8.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.50 | -2.06 | +29.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FYLD | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.45 | -1.04 | +4.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | -0.56 | +1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | -0.48 | +0.94 |
Drawdowns
FYLD vs. TAIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FYLD drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, smaller than the maximum TAIL drawdown of -52.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYLD and TAIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FYLD | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.55% | -52.36% | +7.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.44% | -10.95% | +5.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.15% | -20.65% | +5.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.12% | -38.44% | +13.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -51.53% | +50.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.83% | -29.11% | +20.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.51% | 4.30% | -2.79% |
Volatility
FYLD vs. TAIL - Volatility Comparison
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) at 0.87%. This indicates that FYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FYLD | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.08% | 0.87% | +2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 6.46% | +2.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.58% | 8.53% | +3.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 14.90% | +1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 14.95% | +3.09% |
FYLD vs. TAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FYLD and TAIL have an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Dividends
FYLD vs. TAIL - Dividend Comparison
FYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than TAIL's 3.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 3.64% | 4.07% | 5.41% | 6.06% | 6.13% | 4.74% | 3.94% | 3.73% | 5.17% | 2.85% | 2.72% | 3.98% |
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | 3.49% | 2.88% | 3.48% | 3.74% | 1.50% | 0.49% | 0.36% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FYLD and TAIL have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FYLD has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to TAIL (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYLD dropped -44.55% vs TAIL's -52.36%.
On 5-year performance, FYLD leads with 11.56% vs -8.35% for TAIL. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, TAIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FYLD has performed better with a 11.56% return vs -8.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FYLD and TAIL have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.
FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 3.49% for TAIL.
FYLD is categorized as Global Equities, while TAIL is Volatility Hedged Equity.
FYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FYLD and TAIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer