FYLD vs. PSI
FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) and PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FYLD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while PSI is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. FYLD is actively managed, while PSI is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FYLD returned 12.08%/yr vs 34.59%/yr for PSI. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FYLD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PSI.
Performance
FYLD vs. PSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FYLD achieves a 19.96% return, which is significantly lower than PSI's 112.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FYLD has underperformed PSI with an annualized return of 12.08%, while PSI has yielded a comparatively higher 34.59% annualized return.
FYLD
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 19.96%
- 6M
- 20.90%
- 1Y
- 38.49%
- 3Y*
- 22.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
PSI
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- 10.45%
- YTD
- 112.90%
- 6M
- 110.54%
- 1Y
- 198.40%
- 3Y*
- 55.80%
- 5Y*
- 32.57%
- 10Y*
- 34.59%
FYLD vs. PSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 19.96% | 34.53% | 3.00% | 13.18% | -5.53% | 18.67% | 4.17% | 17.83% | -14.47% | 29.81% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 112.90% | 36.32% | 17.17% | 49.06% | -34.43% | 46.55% | 56.75% | 52.49% | -11.55% | 40.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between FYLD and PSI is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2013 | 0.49 |
The correlation between FYLD and PSI shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FYLD vs. PSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FYLD
PSI
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Energy
FYLD
PSI
-
Financial Services
FYLD
PSI
-
Industrials
FYLD
PSI
Basic Materials
FYLD
PSI
-
Consumer Cyclical
FYLD
PSI
-
Consumer Defensive
FYLD
PSI
-
Technology
FYLD
PSI
Communication Services
FYLD
PSI
-
Utilities
FYLD
PSI
-
Healthcare
FYLD
-
PSI
-
Real Estate
FYLD
-
PSI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FYLD vs. PSI — Risk / Return Rank
FYLD
PSI
FYLD vs. PSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FYLD | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.63 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.11 | 12.90 | -5.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.06 | 45.29 | -20.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FYLD vs. PSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FYLD drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, smaller than the maximum PSI drawdown of -62.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYLD and PSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FYLD | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.55% | -62.96% | +18.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.44% | -15.48% | +10.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.15% | -41.07% | +25.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.12% | -44.85% | +19.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.55% | -44.85% | +0.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | 0.00% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.81% | -15.92% | +7.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | 4.40% | -2.86% |
Volatility
FYLD vs. PSI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) is 3.71%, while Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has a volatility of 18.89%. This indicates that FYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FYLD | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 18.89% | -15.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | 33.67% | -24.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.82% | 40.58% | -28.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 38.44% | -22.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 35.42% | -17.41% |
FYLD vs. PSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PSI's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
FYLD vs. PSI - Dividend Comparison
FYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than PSI's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 3.60% | 4.07% | 5.41% | 6.06% | 6.13% | 4.74% | 3.94% | 3.73% | 5.17% | 2.85% | 2.72% | 3.98% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 0.04% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.40% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.52% | 0.83% | 0.21% | 0.68% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FYLD and PSI have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSI has higher volatility (18.89%) compared to FYLD (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYLD dropped -44.55% vs PSI's -62.96%.
On 10-year performance, PSI leads with 34.59% vs 12.08% for FYLD. On fees, PSI is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, FYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSI has performed better with a 34.59% return vs 12.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSI is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FYLD.
FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 0.04% for PSI.
FYLD is categorized as Global Equities, while PSI is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FYLD and 0.56% for PSI.
PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.92 vs 3.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FYLD and PSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer