FYLD vs. NXTG
FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) and NXTG (First Trust IndXX NextG ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FYLD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while NXTG is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx 5G & NextG Thematic Index. FYLD is actively managed, while NXTG is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FYLD returned 12.08%/yr vs 17.48%/yr for NXTG. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FYLD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for NXTG.
Performance
FYLD vs. NXTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FYLD achieves a 19.96% return, which is significantly lower than NXTG's 44.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FYLD has underperformed NXTG with an annualized return of 12.08%, while NXTG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.48% annualized return.
FYLD
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 19.96%
- 6M
- 20.90%
- 1Y
- 38.49%
- 3Y*
- 22.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
NXTG
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 7.00%
- YTD
- 44.90%
- 6M
- 46.42%
- 1Y
- 67.34%
- 3Y*
- 31.56%
- 5Y*
- 17.46%
- 10Y*
- 17.48%
FYLD vs. NXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 19.96% | 34.53% | 3.00% | 13.18% | -5.53% | 18.67% | 4.17% | 17.83% | -14.47% | 29.81% |
NXTG First Trust IndXX NextG ETF | 44.90% | 28.46% | 12.85% | 28.74% | -24.70% | 21.81% | 27.58% | 29.58% | -17.25% | 28.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between FYLD and NXTG is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2013 | 0.62 |
The correlation between FYLD and NXTG shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FYLD vs. NXTG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FYLD
NXTG
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
FYLD
NXTG
-
Financial Services
FYLD
NXTG
-
Industrials
FYLD
NXTG
Basic Materials
FYLD
NXTG
-
Consumer Cyclical
FYLD
NXTG
Consumer Defensive
FYLD
NXTG
-
Technology
FYLD
NXTG
Communication Services
FYLD
NXTG
Utilities
FYLD
NXTG
-
Healthcare
FYLD
-
NXTG
-
Real Estate
FYLD
-
NXTG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FYLD vs. NXTG — Risk / Return Rank
FYLD
NXTG
FYLD vs. NXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FYLD | NXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.58 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.11 | 5.91 | +1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.06 | 22.94 | +2.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FYLD vs. NXTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FYLD drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, which is greater than NXTG's maximum drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYLD and NXTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FYLD | NXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.55% | -33.61% | -10.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.44% | -11.45% | +6.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.15% | -17.75% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.12% | -33.61% | +8.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.55% | -33.61% | -10.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -7.01% | +6.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.81% | -7.91% | -0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | 2.95% | -1.41% |
Volatility
FYLD vs. NXTG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) is 3.71%, while First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) has a volatility of 11.94%. This indicates that FYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NXTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FYLD | NXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 11.94% | -8.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | 18.01% | -8.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.82% | 20.65% | -8.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 18.38% | -2.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 19.08% | -1.07% |
FYLD vs. NXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than NXTG's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
FYLD vs. NXTG - Dividend Comparison
FYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than NXTG's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 3.60% | 4.07% | 5.41% | 6.06% | 6.13% | 4.74% | 3.94% | 3.73% | 5.17% | 2.85% | 2.72% | 3.98% |
NXTG First Trust IndXX NextG ETF | 1.18% | 1.56% | 1.51% | 2.15% | 2.04% | 1.97% | 1.04% | 0.77% | 1.27% | 1.65% | 1.23% | 1.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FYLD and NXTG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NXTG has higher volatility (11.94%) compared to FYLD (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYLD dropped -44.55% vs NXTG's -33.61%.
On 10-year performance, NXTG leads with 17.48% vs 12.08% for FYLD. On fees, FYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NXTG has performed better with a 17.48% return vs 12.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for NXTG.
FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 1.18% for NXTG.
FYLD is categorized as Global Equities, while NXTG is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FYLD and 0.70% for NXTG.
NXTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 3.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FYLD and NXTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer