FYLD vs. AZTD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) and AZTD (Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF) are both Global Equities funds. FYLD is actively managed, while AZTD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FYLD returned 21.72%/yr vs 16.97%/yr for AZTD. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FYLD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AZTD.

Performance

FYLD vs. AZTD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYLD achieves a 16.00% return, which is significantly higher than AZTD's 13.62% return.

FYLD

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: -2.27%
• YTD: 16.00%
• 6M: 16.03%
• 1Y: 35.30%
• 3Y*: 21.72%
• 5Y*: 11.36%
• 10Y*: 11.87%

AZTD

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 13.62%
• 6M: 11.59%
• 1Y: 24.19%
• 3Y*: 16.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYLD vs. AZTD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF	16.00%	34.53%	3.00%	13.18%	2.94%
AZTD Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF	13.62%	25.46%	6.87%	10.34%	-1.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FYLD and AZTD is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2022	0.68

The correlation between FYLD and AZTD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

FYLD vs. AZTD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FYLD	AZTD
Energy	29.3%	5.8%
Financial Services	20.7%	14.6%
Industrials	16.2%	17.9%
Basic Materials	9.5%	3.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	21.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	4.0%
Communication Services	3.8%	3.9%
Technology	3.5%	20.7%
Utilities	1.6%	3.6%
Healthcare	-	8.8%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

FYLD vs. AZTD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYLD

FYLD Risk / Return Rank: 91
FYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 93

AZTD

AZTD Risk / Return Rank: 44
AZTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
AZTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
AZTD Omega Ratio Rank: 39
AZTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
AZTD Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYLD vs. AZTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FYLD	AZTD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.95	1.37	+1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.04	1.99	+2.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.24	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.52	2.17	+4.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.40	7.06	+15.34

FYLD vs. AZTD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is higher than the AZTD Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYLD and AZTD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FYLD vs. AZTD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYLD drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, which is greater than AZTD's maximum drawdown of -16.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYLD and AZTD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FYLD	AZTD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.55%	-16.75%	-27.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.44%	-11.19%	+5.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.15%	-16.75%	+1.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.62%	-2.14%	-1.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.80%	-3.86%	-4.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	3.43%	-1.85%

Volatility

FYLD vs. AZTD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) is 4.20%, while Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that FYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AZTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FYLD	AZTD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	4.92%	-0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.44%	13.52%	-4.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.04%	17.73%	-5.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.26%	18.56%	-2.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.83%	18.56%	-0.73%

FYLD vs. AZTD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than AZTD's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FYLD vs. AZTD - Dividend Comparison

FYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than AZTD's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AZTD Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF	0.93%	1.05%	1.87%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF	3.47%	4.07%	5.41%	6.06%	6.13%	4.74%	3.94%	3.73%	5.17%	2.85%	2.72%	3.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FYLD and AZTD in my portfolio?

FYLD and AZTD have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FYLD or AZTD?

AZTD has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to FYLD (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYLD dropped -44.55% vs AZTD's -16.75%.

Which ETF is better, FYLD or AZTD?

On 3-year performance, FYLD leads with 21.72% vs 16.97% for AZTD. On fees, FYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FYLD has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FYLD or AZTD?

Over the 3-year period, FYLD has performed better with a 21.72% return vs 16.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FYLD or AZTD?

FYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AZTD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FYLD or AZTD?

FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 0.93% for AZTD.

What is the main difference between FYLD and AZTD?

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FYLD and 0.75% for AZTD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.