PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYBTX vs. PBDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYBTX vs. PBDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund (FYBTX) and T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund (PBDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYBTX achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly higher than PBDIX's 0.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FYBTX has outperformed PBDIX with an annualized return of 2.57%, while PBDIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.88% annualized return.


FYBTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.91%
6M
1.24%
1Y
4.18%
3Y*
5.26%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
2.57%

PBDIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.47%
YTD
0.20%
6M
0.62%
1Y
6.80%
3Y*
4.84%
5Y*
0.50%
10Y*
1.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYBTX vs. PBDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FYBTX
Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund
0.91%5.72%5.13%6.08%-3.50%-0.54%3.99%5.07%1.66%1.50%
PBDIX
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund
0.20%8.71%2.66%6.02%-14.24%-1.45%8.17%8.69%-0.01%3.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FYBTX and PBDIX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.71

The correlation between FYBTX and PBDIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYBTX vs. PBDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYBTX
FYBTX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FYBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FYBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

PBDIX
PBDIX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PBDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
PBDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYBTX vs. PBDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund (FYBTX) and T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund (PBDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FYBTXPBDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.30

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

2.24

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.19

6.58

+6.61

FYBTX vs. PBDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYBTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the PBDIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYBTX and PBDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FYBTXPBDIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

1.63

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.25

0.08

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.34

0.38

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

0.85

+0.53

Drawdowns

FYBTX vs. PBDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYBTX drawdown since its inception was -6.00%, smaller than the maximum PBDIX drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYBTX and PBDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYBTXPBDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.00%

-19.20%

+13.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.19%

-3.08%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.19%

-6.19%

+5.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.00%

-19.10%

+13.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.00%

-19.20%

+13.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-1.60%

+1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.72%

-2.45%

+1.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.32%

1.03%

-0.71%

Volatility

FYBTX vs. PBDIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund (FYBTX) is 0.54%, while T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund (PBDIX) has a volatility of 1.49%. This indicates that FYBTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYBTXPBDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

1.49%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.35%

3.09%

-1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91%

4.22%

-2.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.19%

6.06%

-3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.92%

4.99%

-3.07%

FYBTX vs. PBDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYBTX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PBDIX's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FYBTX vs. PBDIX - Dividend Comparison

FYBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, less than PBDIX's 5.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYBTX
Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund
4.73%4.66%3.67%2.76%1.26%1.65%2.31%2.72%2.45%1.59%1.24%0.00%
PBDIX
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund
5.68%5.59%5.17%4.00%2.01%1.84%3.59%3.18%2.94%2.75%2.82%2.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


FYBTX and PBDIX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBDIX has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to FYBTX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYBTX dropped -6.00% vs PBDIX's -19.20%.

FYBTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYBTX and PBDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer