FXU vs. ZAP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FXU (First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund) and ZAP (Global X U.S. Electrification ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds - FXU tracks the StrataQuant Utilities Index while ZAP tracks the Global X U.S. Electrification Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FXU returned 13.42% vs 28.84% for ZAP. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FXU charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for ZAP.

Performance

FXU vs. ZAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) and Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXU achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly lower than ZAP's 15.14% return.

FXU

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -3.16%
• YTD: 6.16%
• 6M: 5.04%
• 1Y: 13.42%
• 3Y*: 17.52%
• 5Y*: 11.68%
• 10Y*: 9.21%

ZAP

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: -3.98%
• YTD: 15.14%
• 6M: 13.19%
• 1Y: 28.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXU vs. ZAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FXU First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund	6.16%	21.86%	1.82%
ZAP Global X U.S. Electrification ETF	15.14%	21.84%	1.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FXU and ZAP is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024	0.80

The correlation between FXU and ZAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FXU vs. ZAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXU

FXU Risk / Return Rank: 28
FXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
FXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
FXU Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FXU Martin Ratio Rank: 30

ZAP

ZAP Risk / Return Rank: 60
ZAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ZAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
ZAP Omega Ratio Rank: 52
ZAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
ZAP Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXU vs. ZAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) and Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FXU	ZAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	1.92	-0.89
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	2.62	-1.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.33	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	4.01	-2.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.43	10.25	-5.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FXU vs. ZAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXU Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the ZAP Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXU and ZAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FXU	ZAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.02	1.92	-0.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	1.63	-1.22

Drawdowns

FXU vs. ZAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXU drawdown since its inception was -49.00%, which is greater than ZAP's maximum drawdown of -12.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXU and ZAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FXU	ZAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.00%	-12.38%	-36.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.63%	-7.23%	-1.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.34%	-4.11%	-3.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.64%	-2.57%	-5.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.07%	2.83%	+0.24%

Volatility

FXU vs. ZAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) is 4.65%, while Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) has a volatility of 6.28%. This indicates that FXU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FXU	ZAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.65%	6.28%	-1.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.14%	11.74%	-1.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.17%	15.13%	-1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.58%	16.91%	-0.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.33%	16.91%	+1.42%

FXU vs. ZAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXU has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than ZAP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FXU vs. ZAP - Dividend Comparison

FXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than ZAP's 1.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FXU First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund	2.20%	2.29%	2.41%	2.52%	2.03%	2.00%	3.97%	2.34%	2.40%	3.81%	2.62%	3.90%
ZAP Global X U.S. Electrification ETF	1.55%	1.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FXU and ZAP in my portfolio?

FXU and ZAP have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FXU or ZAP?

ZAP has higher volatility (6.28%) compared to FXU (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXU dropped -49.00% vs ZAP's -12.38%.

Which ETF is better, FXU or ZAP?

On 1-year performance, ZAP leads with 28.84% vs 13.42% for FXU. On fees, ZAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FXU has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FXU or ZAP?

Over the 1-year period, ZAP has performed better with a 28.84% return vs 13.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FXU or ZAP?

ZAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for FXU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FXU or ZAP?

FXU has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 1.55% for ZAP.

What is the main difference between FXU and ZAP?

FXU tracks StrataQuant Utilities Index, while ZAP tracks Global X U.S. Electrification Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for FXU and 0.50% for ZAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.