FXU vs. IVEP
FXU (First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund) and IVEP (Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Utilities Index, while IVEP is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FXU charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for IVEP.
Performance
FXU vs. IVEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FXU
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -3.16%
- YTD
- 6.16%
- 6M
- 5.04%
- 1Y
- 13.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.52%
- 5Y*
- 11.68%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
IVEP
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXU vs. IVEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FXU First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund | -6.38% |
IVEP Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF | 8.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXU and IVEP is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXU vs. IVEP — Risk / Return Rank
FXU
IVEP
FXU vs. IVEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF (IVEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXU | IVEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.45 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.43 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXU | IVEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 2.62 | -2.21 |
Drawdowns
FXU vs. IVEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXU drawdown since its inception was -49.00%, which is greater than IVEP's maximum drawdown of -7.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXU and IVEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXU | IVEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.00% | -7.34% | -41.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.34% | -3.31% | -4.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.64% | -1.97% | -5.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | — | — |
Volatility
FXU vs. IVEP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXU | IVEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.17% | 26.29% | -13.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 26.29% | -9.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 26.29% | -7.96% |
FXU vs. IVEP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXU has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than IVEP's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXU vs. IVEP - Dividend Comparison
FXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, while IVEP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXU First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund | 2.20% | 2.29% | 2.41% | 2.52% | 2.03% | 2.00% | 3.97% | 2.34% | 2.40% | 3.81% | 2.62% | 3.90% |
IVEP Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXU and IVEP have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FXU is cheaper at 0.62% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FXU is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVEP.
FXU has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 0.00% for IVEP.
FXU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while IVEP is Industrials Equities. FXU tracks StrataQuant Utilities Index, while IVEP tracks Solactive Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Wedbush. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for FXU and 0.75% for IVEP.
Find the right allocation for FXU and IVEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer