PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXU vs. FDVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXU vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXU achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly lower than FDVV's 8.39% return.


FXU

1D
-0.04%
1M
-3.16%
YTD
6.16%
6M
5.04%
1Y
13.42%
3Y*
17.52%
5Y*
11.68%
10Y*
9.21%

FDVV

1D
-1.12%
1M
4.44%
YTD
8.39%
6M
8.67%
1Y
23.45%
3Y*
20.08%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXU vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXU
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund
6.16%21.86%22.50%-2.12%3.68%17.67%1.53%11.67%5.43%0.98%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
8.39%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%29.24%2.80%24.07%-1.26%14.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FXU and FDVV is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.56

The correlation between FXU and FDVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FXU vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXU
FDVV

Utilities

92.0%
8.7%

Industrials

4.2%
3.4%

Energy

3.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

13.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

11.0%

Financial Services

-

17.0%

Healthcare

-

3.1%

Real Estate

-

10.1%

Technology

-

29.1%

Utilities

FXU
92.0%
FDVV
8.7%

Industrials

FXU
4.2%
FDVV
3.4%

Energy

FXU
3.7%
FDVV

-

Basic Materials

FXU

-

FDVV

-

Communication Services

FXU

-

FDVV
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FXU

-

FDVV
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

FXU

-

FDVV
11.0%

Financial Services

FXU

-

FDVV
17.0%

Healthcare

FXU

-

FDVV
3.1%

Real Estate

FXU

-

FDVV
10.1%

Technology

FXU

-

FDVV
29.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXU vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXU
FXU Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXU Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXU Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXU vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXUFDVVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

2.35

-1.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.45

3.28

-1.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.43

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

2.53

-0.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.43

10.54

-6.11

FXU vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXU Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXU and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXUFDVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

2.35

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.91

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.79

-0.38

Drawdowns

FXU vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXU drawdown since its inception was -49.00%, which is greater than FDVV's maximum drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXU and FDVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXUFDVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.00%

-40.25%

-8.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.63%

-9.30%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.46%

-15.90%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.87%

-20.18%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.34%

-1.12%

-6.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-3.81%

-3.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

2.23%

+0.84%

Volatility

FXU vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 3.14%. This indicates that FXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXUFDVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

3.14%

+1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

7.99%

+2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.17%

10.06%

+3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.58%

14.75%

+1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

17.00%

+1.33%

FXU vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXU has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXU vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

FXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than FDVV's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
2.72%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%0.00%
FXU
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund
2.20%2.29%2.41%2.52%2.03%2.00%3.97%2.34%2.40%3.81%2.62%3.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXU and FDVV have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXU has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to FDVV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXU dropped -49.00% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.36% vs 11.68% for FXU. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.36% return vs 11.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for FXU.

FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 2.20% for FXU.

FXU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. FXU tracks StrataQuant Utilities Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for FXU and 0.29% for FDVV.

FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXU and FDVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer