PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXO vs. QABA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXO vs. QABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund (FXO) and First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXO achieves a -1.28% return, which is significantly lower than QABA's 11.34% return. Over the past 10 years, FXO has outperformed QABA with an annualized return of 12.03%, while QABA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.00% annualized return.


FXO

1D
2.13%
1M
-0.72%
YTD
-1.28%
6M
-0.11%
1Y
12.48%
3Y*
20.09%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
12.03%

QABA

1D
2.94%
1M
1.12%
YTD
11.34%
6M
10.44%
1Y
23.63%
3Y*
19.81%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*
7.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXO vs. QABA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXO
First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund
-1.28%13.59%27.72%9.28%-9.24%37.76%5.95%26.31%-11.72%17.88%
QABA
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund
11.34%4.62%14.49%-2.18%-9.01%34.20%-10.70%22.85%-16.47%0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FXO and QABA is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2009

0.83

The correlation between FXO and QABA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXO vs. QABA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXO
QABA

Financial Services

94.3%
99.7%

Real Estate

5.1%

-

Technology

0.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.3%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

FXO
94.3%
QABA
99.7%

Real Estate

FXO
5.1%
QABA

-

Technology

FXO
0.6%
QABA

-

Basic Materials

FXO

-

QABA

-

Communication Services

FXO

-

QABA

-

Consumer Cyclical

FXO

-

QABA

-

Consumer Defensive

FXO

-

QABA

-

Energy

FXO

-

QABA

-

Healthcare

FXO

-

QABA

-

Industrials

FXO

-

QABA
0.3%

Utilities

FXO

-

QABA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXO vs. QABA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXO
FXO Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXO Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

QABA
QABA Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
QABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
QABA Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
QABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
QABA Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXO vs. QABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund (FXO) and First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXOQABADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.20

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

1.90

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.20

4.72

-1.52

FXO vs. QABA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXO Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the QABA Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXO and QABA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXOQABADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

1.05

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.14

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.24

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.35

-0.04

Drawdowns

FXO vs. QABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXO drawdown since its inception was -71.30%, which is greater than QABA's maximum drawdown of -49.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXO and QABA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXOQABADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.30%

-49.30%

-22.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.72%

-12.49%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.35%

-25.82%

+4.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.80%

-42.93%

+14.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.55%

-49.30%

+0.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.23%

-1.44%

-2.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.11%

-11.43%

-1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

5.02%

-1.10%

Volatility

FXO vs. QABA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund (FXO) is 4.16%, while First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that FXO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXOQABADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

6.18%

-2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.94%

15.47%

-4.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.76%

22.64%

-6.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.98%

26.53%

-4.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.13%

28.70%

-4.57%

FXO vs. QABA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXO has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than QABA's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXO vs. QABA - Dividend Comparison

FXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than QABA's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXO
First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund
2.19%1.78%1.97%2.98%2.49%1.91%2.60%1.72%2.60%1.62%1.35%1.51%
QABA
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund
2.33%2.52%2.37%2.71%2.10%1.68%2.55%1.95%1.90%1.42%1.13%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXO and QABA have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QABA has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to FXO (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXO dropped -71.30% vs QABA's -49.30%.

On 10-year performance, FXO leads with 12.03% vs 7.00% for QABA. On fees, QABA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FXO has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FXO has performed better with a 12.03% return vs 7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QABA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for FXO.

QABA has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 2.19% for FXO.

FXO tracks StrataQuant Financials Index, while QABA tracks NASDAQ OMX ABA Community Bank Index. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for FXO and 0.60% for QABA.

QABA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXO and QABA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer