PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXNAX vs. VBIPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXNAX vs. VBIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus (VBIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FXNAX having a 0.21% return and VBIPX slightly higher at 0.22%. Over the past 10 years, FXNAX has underperformed VBIPX with an annualized return of 1.49%, while VBIPX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.89% annualized return.


FXNAX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.21%
6M
0.33%
1Y
4.56%
3Y*
3.95%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*
1.49%

VBIPX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.56%
1Y
3.46%
3Y*
4.33%
5Y*
1.51%
10Y*
1.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXNAX vs. VBIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
0.21%7.14%1.35%5.82%-13.55%-2.10%7.63%8.50%0.04%3.50%
VBIPX
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus
0.22%6.12%3.78%4.45%-5.68%-1.17%4.73%4.89%1.38%1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FXNAX and VBIPX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2011

0.81

The correlation between FXNAX and VBIPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXNAX vs. VBIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXNAX
FXNAX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FXNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FXNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

VBIPX
VBIPX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
VBIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
VBIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXNAX vs. VBIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus (VBIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXNAXVBIPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.32

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

2.39

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.37

7.79

-2.42

FXNAX vs. VBIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the VBIPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXNAX and VBIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXNAXVBIPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

1.63

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.51

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.79

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.79

-0.34

Drawdowns

FXNAX vs. VBIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXNAX drawdown since its inception was -19.51%, which is greater than VBIPX's maximum drawdown of -8.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXNAX and VBIPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXNAXVBIPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.51%

-8.72%

-10.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

-1.54%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.16%

-1.54%

-4.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.54%

-8.69%

-9.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.51%

-8.72%

-10.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.07%

-0.72%

-2.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-1.19%

-2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.47%

+0.50%

Volatility

FXNAX vs. VBIPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus (VBIPX) at 0.68%. This indicates that FXNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXNAXVBIPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

0.68%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

1.60%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.96%

2.26%

+1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.07%

2.96%

+3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.01%

2.40%

+2.61%

FXNAX vs. VBIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXNAX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VBIPX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FXNAX vs. VBIPX - Dividend Comparison

FXNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, less than VBIPX's 4.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
3.71%3.58%3.40%3.15%1.81%1.74%2.92%2.68%2.74%2.57%2.76%2.52%
VBIPX
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus
4.03%3.86%3.40%2.01%1.40%1.26%1.82%2.27%2.04%1.69%1.53%1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXNAX and VBIPX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXNAX has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to VBIPX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXNAX dropped -19.51% vs VBIPX's -8.72%.

VBIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXNAX and VBIPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer