PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXNAX vs. FSTAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXNAX vs. FSTAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class A (FSTAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXNAX achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than FSTAX's 3.02% return. Over the past 10 years, FXNAX has underperformed FSTAX with an annualized return of 1.51%, while FSTAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.00% annualized return.


FXNAX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.40%
6M
0.43%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
4.02%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*
1.51%

FSTAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.66%
YTD
3.02%
6M
3.50%
1Y
9.70%
3Y*
7.47%
5Y*
2.78%
10Y*
4.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXNAX vs. FSTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
0.40%7.14%1.35%5.82%-13.55%-2.10%7.63%8.50%0.04%3.50%
FSTAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class A
3.02%8.68%4.93%8.82%-11.98%3.22%7.21%10.74%-2.94%7.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FXNAX and FSTAX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011

0.54

The correlation between FXNAX and FSTAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.79 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXNAX vs. FSTAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXNAX
FXNAX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FXNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FXNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FSTAX
FSTAX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FSTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXNAX vs. FSTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class A (FSTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXNAXFSTAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.28

2.73

-1.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.93

4.12

-2.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.57

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

3.75

-1.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.85

16.30

-10.45

FXNAX vs. FSTAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the FSTAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXNAX and FSTAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXNAXFSTAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

2.73

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.62

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.91

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.51

-0.06

Drawdowns

FXNAX vs. FSTAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXNAX drawdown since its inception was -19.51%, smaller than the maximum FSTAX drawdown of -23.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXNAX and FSTAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXNAXFSTAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.51%

-23.29%

+3.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

-2.65%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.16%

-4.04%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.54%

-16.18%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.51%

-16.18%

-3.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

0.00%

-2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-4.83%

+0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.61%

+0.35%

Volatility

FXNAX vs. FSTAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class A (FSTAX) at 1.35%. This indicates that FXNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXNAXFSTAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

1.35%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.82%

2.90%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98%

3.54%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.07%

4.49%

+1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.01%

4.44%

+0.57%

FXNAX vs. FSTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXNAX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FSTAX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXNAX vs. FSTAX - Dividend Comparison

FXNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, less than FSTAX's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSTAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class A
4.01%4.05%3.21%3.70%2.70%4.01%4.32%4.06%3.50%3.70%3.49%2.89%
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
3.71%3.58%3.40%3.15%1.81%1.74%2.92%2.68%2.74%2.57%2.76%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXNAX and FSTAX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXNAX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to FSTAX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXNAX dropped -19.51% vs FSTAX's -23.29%.

FSTAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXNAX and FSTAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer