PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXM.TO vs. PDC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) and Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXM.TO achieves a 18.11% return, which is significantly lower than PDC.TO's 25.42% return. Over the past 10 years, FXM.TO has outperformed PDC.TO with an annualized return of 14.71%, while PDC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.43% annualized return.


FXM.TO

1D
-0.58%
1M
3.42%
6M
14.85%
YTD
18.11%
1Y
45.40%
3Y*
27.60%
5Y*
19.13%
10Y*
14.71%
ALL TIME*
13.03%

PDC.TO

1D
-0.32%
1M
2.24%
6M
22.87%
YTD
25.42%
1Y
38.86%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
11.43%
ALL TIME*
10.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$211.28KCA$184.82KCA$281.27K
CA$73.82KCA$71.46KCA$90.55K

FXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXM.TO
CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF
18.11%38.54%30.05%5.79%-1.19%31.47%6.16%24.14%-16.22%11.51%
PDC.TO
Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF
25.42%21.80%16.38%6.97%-4.17%30.14%-5.48%25.00%-11.85%10.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FXM.TO and PDC.TO is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2012

0.61

The correlation between FXM.TO and PDC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXM.TO
PDC.TO

Basic Materials

16.3%
3.7%

Energy

14.8%
20.4%

Financial Services

14.7%
45.6%

Utilities

14.2%
14.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
6.7%

Communication Services

9.2%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
0.8%

Technology

6.8%
0.7%

Real Estate

3.6%
2.4%

Industrials

3.2%
1.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Basic Materials

FXM.TO
16.3%
PDC.TO
3.7%

Energy

FXM.TO
14.8%
PDC.TO
20.4%

Financial Services

FXM.TO
14.7%
PDC.TO
45.6%

Utilities

FXM.TO
14.2%
PDC.TO
14.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FXM.TO
10.4%
PDC.TO
6.7%

Communication Services

FXM.TO
9.2%
PDC.TO
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

FXM.TO
6.9%
PDC.TO
0.8%

Technology

FXM.TO
6.8%
PDC.TO
0.7%

Real Estate

FXM.TO
3.6%
PDC.TO
2.4%

Industrials

FXM.TO
3.2%
PDC.TO
1.1%

Healthcare

FXM.TO

-

PDC.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXM.TO vs. PDC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FXM.TO
FXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

PDC.TO
PDC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PDC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) and Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXM.TOPDC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

1.87

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.51

9.99

-4.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.50

36.59

-15.09

FXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.99, which is comparable to the PDC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXM.TO and PDC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXM.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.41%, which is greater than PDC.TO's maximum drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXM.TO and PDC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXM.TOPDC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.41%

-41.93%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.11%

-3.86%

-4.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.44%

-10.43%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.08%

-17.98%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.41%

-41.93%

-4.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-1.06%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.64%

-4.47%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.05%

+1.03%

Volatility

FXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) is 2.53%, while Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) has a volatility of 2.78%. This indicates that FXM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXM.TOPDC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

2.78%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.27%

6.60%

+1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.25%

8.70%

+2.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.15%

10.85%

+3.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.88%

15.28%

+1.60%

FXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXM.TO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than PDC.TO's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Dividend Comparison

FXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than PDC.TO's 3.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXM.TO
CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF
1.72%1.91%2.17%2.96%2.18%2.19%2.40%2.04%2.52%1.70%1.83%2.24%
PDC.TO
Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF
3.17%3.96%4.48%4.77%4.24%3.65%5.07%4.33%5.12%4.23%3.77%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXM.TO and PDC.TO have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PDC.TO is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PDC.TO is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXM.TO.

FXM.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while PDC.TO is Dividend. FXM.TO tracks Morningstar Canada Target Value Index, while PDC.TO tracks NASDAQ Select Canadian Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: CI and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FXM.TO and 0.58% for PDC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXM.TO and PDC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer