FXM.TO vs. PDC.TO
FXM.TO (CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF) and PDC.TO (Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXM.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Canada Target Value Index, while PDC.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the NASDAQ Select Canadian Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXM.TO returned 14.71%/yr vs 11.43%/yr for PDC.TO. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FXM.TO charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDC.TO.
Performance
FXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXM.TO achieves a 18.11% return, which is significantly lower than PDC.TO's 25.42% return. Over the past 10 years, FXM.TO has outperformed PDC.TO with an annualized return of 14.71%, while PDC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.43% annualized return.
FXM.TO
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- 6M
- 14.85%
- YTD
- 18.11%
- 1Y
- 45.40%
- 3Y*
- 27.60%
- 5Y*
- 19.13%
- 10Y*
- 14.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.03%
PDC.TO
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 22.87%
- YTD
- 25.42%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 22.41%
- 5Y*
- 14.54%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$211.28K | CA$184.82K | CA$281.27K | |
| CA$73.82K | CA$71.46K | CA$90.55K |
FXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF | 18.11% | 38.54% | 30.05% | 5.79% | -1.19% | 31.47% | 6.16% | 24.14% | -16.22% | 11.51% |
PDC.TO Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF | 25.42% | 21.80% | 16.38% | 6.97% | -4.17% | 30.14% | -5.48% | 25.00% | -11.85% | 10.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXM.TO and PDC.TO is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2012 | 0.61 |
The correlation between FXM.TO and PDC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXM.TO
PDC.TO
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Real Estate
Industrials
Healthcare
-
-
Basic Materials
FXM.TO
PDC.TO
Energy
FXM.TO
PDC.TO
Financial Services
FXM.TO
PDC.TO
Utilities
FXM.TO
PDC.TO
Consumer Cyclical
FXM.TO
PDC.TO
Communication Services
FXM.TO
PDC.TO
Consumer Defensive
FXM.TO
PDC.TO
Technology
FXM.TO
PDC.TO
Real Estate
FXM.TO
PDC.TO
Industrials
FXM.TO
PDC.TO
Healthcare
FXM.TO
-
PDC.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXM.TO vs. PDC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FXM.TO
PDC.TO
FXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) and Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXM.TO | PDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 1.87 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.51 | 9.99 | -4.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.50 | 36.59 | -15.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXM.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.41%, which is greater than PDC.TO's maximum drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXM.TO and PDC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXM.TO | PDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.41% | -41.93% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.11% | -3.86% | -4.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.44% | -10.43% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.08% | -17.98% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.41% | -41.93% | -4.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -1.06% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -4.47% | -0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 1.05% | +1.03% |
Volatility
FXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) is 2.53%, while Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) has a volatility of 2.78%. This indicates that FXM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXM.TO | PDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.53% | 2.78% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.27% | 6.60% | +1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.25% | 8.70% | +2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 10.85% | +3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 15.28% | +1.60% |
FXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXM.TO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than PDC.TO's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Dividend Comparison
FXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than PDC.TO's 3.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF | 1.72% | 1.91% | 2.17% | 2.96% | 2.18% | 2.19% | 2.40% | 2.04% | 2.52% | 1.70% | 1.83% | 2.24% |
PDC.TO Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF | 3.17% | 3.96% | 4.48% | 4.77% | 4.24% | 3.65% | 5.07% | 4.33% | 5.12% | 4.23% | 3.77% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXM.TO and PDC.TO have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PDC.TO is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PDC.TO is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXM.TO.
FXM.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while PDC.TO is Dividend. FXM.TO tracks Morningstar Canada Target Value Index, while PDC.TO tracks NASDAQ Select Canadian Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: CI and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FXM.TO and 0.58% for PDC.TO.
Find the right allocation for FXM.TO and PDC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer