FXLCX vs. VITPX
FXLCX (Fidelity Flex Large Cap Focused Index Fund) and VITPX (Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FXLCX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for VITPX.
Performance
FXLCX vs. VITPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXLCX achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than VITPX's 11.70% return.
FXLCX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 10.01%
- 6M
- 9.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VITPX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- 1Y
- 28.02%
- 3Y*
- 22.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.10%
FXLCX vs. VITPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FXLCX Fidelity Flex Large Cap Focused Index Fund | 10.01% | 7.64% |
VITPX Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares | 11.70% | 7.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXLCX and VITPX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXLCX vs. VITPX — Risk / Return Rank
FXLCX
VITPX
FXLCX vs. VITPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Large Cap Focused Index Fund (FXLCX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXLCX | VITPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.76 | 0.51 | +1.26 |
Drawdowns
FXLCX vs. VITPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXLCX drawdown since its inception was -9.23%, smaller than the maximum VITPX drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXLCX and VITPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXLCX | VITPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.23% | -55.28% | +46.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -0.25% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.40% | -8.02% | +6.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.93% | — |
Volatility
FXLCX vs. VITPX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXLCX | VITPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.99% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.53% | 12.21% | +0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.53% | 17.35% | -4.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.53% | 18.41% | -5.88% |
FXLCX vs. VITPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXLCX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VITPX's 0.02% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FXLCX vs. VITPX - Dividend Comparison
FXLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than VITPX's 2.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXLCX Fidelity Flex Large Cap Focused Index Fund | 0.43% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VITPX Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares | 2.24% | 2.64% | 4.14% | 2.41% | 6.48% | 5.38% | 11.57% | 2.91% | 3.93% | 1.90% | 2.80% | 2.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, FXLCX and VITPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for FXLCX and VITPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer