FXLCX vs. FSKAX
FXLCX (Fidelity Flex Large Cap Focused Index Fund) and FSKAX (Fidelity Total Market Index Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from Fidelity. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FXLCX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FSKAX.
Performance
FXLCX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXLCX achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's 10.82% return.
FXLCX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -1.52%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 8.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSKAX
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- 6M
- 10.82%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 1Y
- 22.14%
- 3Y*
- 20.36%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- 14.94%
FXLCX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FXLCX Fidelity Flex Large Cap Focused Index Fund | 8.70% | 7.64% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 10.82% | 7.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXLCX and FSKAX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2025 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXLCX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank
FXLCX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FSKAX
FXLCX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Large Cap Focused Index Fund (FXLCX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXLCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.57 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.25 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXLCX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXLCX drawdown since its inception was -9.23%, smaller than the maximum FSKAX drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXLCX and FSKAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXLCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.23% | -35.01% | +25.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.52% | -1.12% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -4.01% | +2.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.03% | — |
Volatility
FXLCX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXLCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.04% | 12.92% | +0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.04% | 17.52% | -4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.04% | 18.44% | -5.40% |
FXLCX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXLCX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FXLCX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison
FXLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than FSKAX's 0.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 0.94% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 0.82% |
FXLCX Fidelity Flex Large Cap Focused Index Fund | 0.44% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, FXLCX and FSKAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for FXLCX and FSKAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer