PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXLCX vs. SWPPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXLCX vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Large Cap Focused Index Fund (FXLCX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXLCX achieves a 9.73% return, which is significantly lower than SWPPX's 10.83% return.


FXLCX

1D
0.94%
1M
1.99%
6M
8.02%
YTD
9.73%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SWPPX

1D
0.83%
1M
1.57%
6M
8.91%
YTD
10.83%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
21.17%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
15.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXLCX vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FXLCX
Fidelity Flex Large Cap Focused Index Fund
9.73%7.64%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
10.83%7.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FXLCX and SWPPX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2025

0.99

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXLCX vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXLCX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SWPPX
SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXLCX vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Large Cap Focused Index Fund (FXLCX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXLCXSWPPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.82

FXLCX vs. SWPPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXLCX vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXLCX drawdown since its inception was -9.23%, smaller than the maximum SWPPX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXLCX and SWPPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXLCXSWPPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.23%

-55.06%

+45.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.77%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.47%

-9.92%

+8.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

Volatility

FXLCX vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXLCXSWPPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.98%

12.56%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.98%

17.04%

-4.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.98%

18.21%

-5.23%

FXLCX vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXLCX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FXLCX vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison

FXLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than SWPPX's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXLCX
Fidelity Flex Large Cap Focused Index Fund
0.43%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
1.00%1.11%1.23%1.43%1.67%1.27%1.81%1.95%2.67%1.79%2.55%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FXLCX and SWPPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXLCX and SWPPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer