FXIEX vs. NMTRX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX).
FXIEX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Jun 24, 2012. NMTRX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on May 30, 2007.
Performance
FXIEX vs. NMTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FXIEX vs. NMTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXIEX PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE | -0.41% | 3.37% | 5.16% | 8.92% | -10.89% | 2.19% | 7.22% | 8.45% | 1.00% | 7.71% |
NMTRX Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts | -0.12% | 3.90% | 1.99% | 6.21% | -11.98% | 2.69% | 5.25% | 9.26% | 1.06% | 7.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXIEX achieves a -0.41% return, which is significantly lower than NMTRX's -0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FXIEX has outperformed NMTRX with an annualized return of 2.78%, while NMTRX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.27% annualized return.
FXIEX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- -0.41%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 2.29%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- 1.53%
- 10Y*
- 2.78%
NMTRX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- YTD
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 3.78%
- 3Y*
- 3.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.38%
- 10Y*
- 2.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FXIEX vs. NMTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXIEX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than NMTRX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FXIEX vs. NMTRX — Risk / Return Rank
FXIEX
NMTRX
FXIEX vs. NMTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXIEX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.57 | 0.84 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.82 | 1.16 | -0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.23 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 0.99 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.61 | 2.89 | -1.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXIEX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | 0.84 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.10 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.52 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.97 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between FXIEX and NMTRX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FXIEX vs. NMTRX - Dividend Comparison
FXIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than NMTRX's 4.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXIEX PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE | 2.03% | 2.75% | 4.53% | 3.98% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 3.37% | 3.63% | 3.79% | 2.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NMTRX Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts | 4.19% | 4.46% | 3.55% | 3.67% | 3.28% | 2.73% | 2.92% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 3.28% | 3.71% | 3.91% |
Drawdowns
FXIEX vs. NMTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXIEX drawdown since its inception was -15.25%, smaller than the maximum NMTRX drawdown of -16.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXIEX and NMTRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXIEX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.25% | -16.36% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.11% | -4.75% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.25% | -16.36% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.25% | -16.36% | +1.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -2.25% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.92% | -2.93% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 1.62% | +0.22% |
Volatility
FXIEX vs. NMTRX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) have volatilities of 1.07% and 1.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FXIEX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 1.07% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | 1.82% | +0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.73% | 4.93% | +0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.30% | 3.97% | +0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.07% | 4.38% | -0.31% |