FXI vs. SOXX
FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXI is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index, while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXI returned 2.55%/yr vs 36.08%/yr for SOXX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXI charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
FXI vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXI achieves a -13.61% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 100.58% return. Over the past 10 years, FXI has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 2.55%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 36.08% annualized return.
FXI
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -6.88%
- YTD
- -13.61%
- 6M
- -14.15%
- 1Y
- -7.33%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- -4.39%
- 10Y*
- 2.55%
SOXX
- 1D
- -7.88%
- 1M
- 12.35%
- YTD
- 100.58%
- 6M
- 98.07%
- 1Y
- 167.63%
- 3Y*
- 56.18%
- 5Y*
- 33.69%
- 10Y*
- 36.08%
FXI vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -13.61% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 14.90% | -13.28% | 36.26% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 100.58% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 52.72% | 62.42% | -6.49% | 39.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXI and SOXX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2004 | 0.53 |
The correlation between FXI and SOXX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FXI vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXI
SOXX
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FXI
SOXX
-
Consumer Cyclical
FXI
SOXX
-
Communication Services
FXI
SOXX
-
Technology
FXI
SOXX
Energy
FXI
SOXX
-
Basic Materials
FXI
SOXX
-
Industrials
FXI
SOXX
-
Healthcare
FXI
SOXX
-
Real Estate
FXI
SOXX
-
Consumer Defensive
FXI
SOXX
-
Utilities
FXI
SOXX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXI vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
FXI
SOXX
FXI vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXI | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.60 | -0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 10.70 | -11.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.90 | 38.46 | -39.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXI vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, roughly equal to the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXI and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXI | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.68% | -70.21% | -2.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.91% | -15.77% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.72% | -41.36% | +12.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.94% | -45.75% | -9.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.81% | -45.75% | -15.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.97% | -7.88% | -24.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.21% | -19.94% | -11.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.13% | 4.38% | +3.75% |
Volatility
FXI vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) is 6.02%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 22.75%. This indicates that FXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXI | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.02% | 22.75% | -16.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.66% | 33.44% | -18.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.00% | 39.42% | -19.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.72% | 37.21% | -5.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.60% | 34.00% | -6.40% |
FXI vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXI has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXI vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than SOXX's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.07% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.24% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXI and SOXX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (22.75%) compared to FXI (6.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXI dropped -72.68% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 36.08% vs 2.55% for FXI. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, FXI has been the lower-risk option at 6.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 36.08% return vs 2.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.
FXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.24% for SOXX.
FXI is categorized as China Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FXI and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.28 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXI and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer