FXI vs. SGOV
FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) and SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXI is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index, while SGOV is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FXI returned -3.22%/yr vs 3.62%/yr for SGOV. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FXI charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SGOV.
Performance
FXI vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXI achieves a -12.01% return, which is significantly lower than SGOV's 1.92% return.
FXI
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- 6M
- -17.10%
- YTD
- -12.01%
- 1Y
- -6.64%
- 3Y*
- 8.44%
- 5Y*
- -3.22%
- 10Y*
- 1.84%
SGOV
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.62%
- 10Y*
- —
FXI vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -12.01% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 24.63% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 1.92% | 4.24% | 5.27% | 5.12% | 1.58% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXI and SGOV is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2020 | 0.04 |
The correlation between FXI and SGOV shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.05 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXI vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank
FXI
SGOV
FXI vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXI | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -21.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -384.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 384.06 | -383.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 391.99 | -392.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 6,210.22 | -6,210.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXI vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXI and SGOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXI | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.68% | -0.03% | -72.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.94% | -0.01% | -22.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.72% | -0.01% | -28.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.44% | -0.03% | -52.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.71% | 0.00% | -30.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.22% | -0.00% | -31.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.41% | 0.00% | +9.41% |
Volatility
FXI vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison
iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.05%. This indicates that FXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXI | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.08% | 0.05% | +6.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.55% | 0.13% | +14.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.12% | 0.19% | +19.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.67% | 0.24% | +31.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.58% | 0.24% | +27.34% |
FXI vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXI has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXI vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison
FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than SGOV's 3.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.03% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 3.80% | 4.10% | 5.10% | 4.87% | 1.45% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXI and SGOV have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXI has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to SGOV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXI dropped -72.68% vs SGOV's -0.03%.
On 5-year performance, SGOV leads with 3.62% vs -3.22% for FXI. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SGOV has performed better with a 3.62% return vs -3.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.
SGOV has the higher dividend yield at 3.80%, compared with 2.03% for FXI.
FXI is categorized as China Equities, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FXI and 0.09% for SGOV.
SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.83 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXI and SGOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer