FXI vs. INDA
FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) and INDA (iShares MSCI India ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXI is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index, while INDA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXI returned 3.13%/yr vs 7.09%/yr for INDA. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FXI charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for INDA.
Performance
FXI vs. INDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXI achieves a -7.83% return, which is significantly higher than INDA's -10.58% return. Over the past 10 years, FXI has underperformed INDA with an annualized return of 3.13%, while INDA has yielded a comparatively higher 7.09% annualized return.
FXI
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -7.76%
- YTD
- -7.83%
- 6M
- -8.72%
- 1Y
- -2.91%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- -3.08%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
INDA
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- -10.58%
- 6M
- -9.05%
- 1Y
- -11.81%
- 3Y*
- 4.51%
- 5Y*
- 2.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.09%
FXI vs. INDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -7.83% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 14.90% | -13.28% | 36.26% |
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | -10.58% | 2.68% | 8.63% | 17.16% | -8.94% | 21.36% | 14.83% | 6.49% | -6.67% | 36.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXI and INDA is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2012 | 0.49 |
The correlation between FXI and INDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (3 years) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FXI vs. INDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXI
INDA
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
FXI
INDA
Consumer Cyclical
FXI
INDA
Communication Services
FXI
INDA
Technology
FXI
INDA
Energy
FXI
INDA
Industrials
FXI
INDA
Basic Materials
FXI
INDA
Healthcare
FXI
INDA
Real Estate
FXI
INDA
Consumer Defensive
FXI
INDA
Utilities
FXI
INDA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXI vs. INDA — Risk / Return Rank
FXI
INDA
FXI vs. INDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXI | INDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.88 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | -0.63 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | -1.46 | +1.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXI vs. INDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, which is greater than INDA's maximum drawdown of -45.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXI and INDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXI | INDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.68% | -45.07% | -27.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.03% | -18.69% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.72% | -22.72% | -6.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.94% | -22.72% | -32.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.81% | -45.07% | -15.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.42% | -17.77% | -9.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.21% | -9.59% | -21.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.66% | 8.09% | -0.43% |
Volatility
FXI vs. INDA - Volatility Comparison
iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) at 4.16%. This indicates that FXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXI | INDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 4.16% | +2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.30% | 12.77% | +1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.90% | 14.79% | +5.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.67% | 15.40% | +16.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.64% | 21.11% | +6.53% |
FXI vs. INDA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXI has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than INDA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXI vs. INDA - Dividend Comparison
FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, while INDA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.62% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 6.44% | 0.27% | 0.99% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 0.90% | 1.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXI and INDA have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXI has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to INDA (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXI dropped -72.68% vs INDA's -45.07%.
On 10-year performance, INDA leads with 7.09% vs 3.13% for FXI. On fees, INDA is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, INDA has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, INDA has performed better with a 7.09% return vs 3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INDA is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.
FXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.00% for INDA.
FXI is categorized as China Equities, while INDA is Asia Pacific Equities. FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index, while INDA tracks MSCI India Index. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FXI and 0.69% for INDA.
FXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXI and INDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer