PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXI vs. EWY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXI vs. EWY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXI achieves a -5.04% return, which is significantly lower than EWY's 120.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FXI has underperformed EWY with an annualized return of 3.20%, while EWY has yielded a comparatively higher 17.54% annualized return.


FXI

1D
2.89%
1M
-1.22%
YTD
-5.04%
6M
-6.93%
1Y
5.44%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
-2.54%
10Y*
3.20%

EWY

1D
-1.00%
1M
32.43%
YTD
120.66%
6M
138.24%
1Y
255.28%
3Y*
52.36%
5Y*
20.77%
10Y*
17.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXI vs. EWY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
-5.04%28.95%28.98%-12.42%-20.66%-20.06%8.92%14.90%-13.28%36.26%
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
120.66%95.33%-20.48%19.05%-26.59%-7.58%39.43%7.97%-20.37%44.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FXI and EWY is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2004

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between FXI and EWY has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FXI vs. EWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXI
EWY

Financial Services

34.4%
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

25.7%
5.7%

Communication Services

12.2%
2.9%

Technology

9.3%
52.4%

Energy

5.2%
1.4%

Basic Materials

4.1%
2.0%

Industrials

3.8%
20.4%

Healthcare

2.2%
3.5%

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
1.7%

Utilities

0.4%
0.4%

Financial Services

FXI
34.4%
EWY
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FXI
25.7%
EWY
5.7%

Communication Services

FXI
12.2%
EWY
2.9%

Technology

FXI
9.3%
EWY
52.4%

Energy

FXI
5.2%
EWY
1.4%

Basic Materials

FXI
4.1%
EWY
2.0%

Industrials

FXI
3.8%
EWY
20.4%

Healthcare

FXI
2.2%
EWY
3.5%

Real Estate

FXI
1.1%
EWY

-

Consumer Defensive

FXI
0.9%
EWY
1.7%

Utilities

FXI
0.4%
EWY
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXI vs. EWY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXI
FXI Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXI Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXI Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

EWY
EWY Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
EWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWY Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
EWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWY Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXI vs. EWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXIEWYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.28

6.11

-5.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.53

5.35

-4.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.75

-0.69

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

11.34

-10.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.91

42.32

-41.41

FXI vs. EWY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXI Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the EWY Sharpe Ratio of 6.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXI and EWY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXIEWYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

6.11

-5.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.72

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

0.64

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.34

-0.16

Drawdowns

FXI vs. EWY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, roughly equal to the maximum EWY drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXI and EWY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXIEWYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.68%

-74.14%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.62%

-23.08%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.72%

-27.36%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.94%

-48.55%

-6.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.81%

-49.73%

-11.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.22%

-1.00%

-24.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.23%

-20.13%

-11.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.17%

6.19%

+0.98%

Volatility

FXI vs. EWY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) is 6.80%, while iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a volatility of 20.22%. This indicates that FXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXIEWYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.80%

20.22%

-13.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.18%

37.40%

-23.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.82%

42.10%

-22.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.67%

28.83%

+2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.66%

27.37%

+0.29%

FXI vs. EWY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXI has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than EWY's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXI vs. EWY - Dividend Comparison

FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than EWY's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
0.95%2.10%2.55%2.52%1.23%2.16%0.73%2.10%1.34%2.90%1.21%2.42%
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
2.54%2.42%1.76%3.17%2.61%1.60%2.19%2.74%2.69%2.31%2.69%2.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXI and EWY have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWY has higher volatility (20.22%) compared to FXI (6.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXI dropped -72.68% vs EWY's -74.14%.

On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 17.54% vs 3.20% for FXI. On fees, EWY is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FXI has been the lower-risk option at 6.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 17.54% return vs 3.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWY is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.

FXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.95% for EWY.

FXI is categorized as China Equities, while EWY is Asia Pacific Equities. FXI tracks FTSE China 25 Index, while EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FXI and 0.59% for EWY.

EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.11 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXI and EWY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer