FXI vs. EUFN
FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) and EUFN (iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXI is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index, while EUFN is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXI returned 3.13%/yr vs 13.48%/yr for EUFN. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXI charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for EUFN.
Performance
FXI vs. EUFN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXI achieves a -7.83% return, which is significantly lower than EUFN's 4.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FXI has underperformed EUFN with an annualized return of 3.13%, while EUFN has yielded a comparatively higher 13.48% annualized return.
FXI
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -7.76%
- YTD
- -7.83%
- 6M
- -8.72%
- 1Y
- -2.91%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- -3.08%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
EUFN
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 4.75%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 26.28%
- 3Y*
- 32.04%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.48%
FXI vs. EUFN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -7.83% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 14.90% | -13.28% | 36.26% |
EUFN iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 4.75% | 65.73% | 17.20% | 26.15% | -8.78% | 19.13% | -8.55% | 20.73% | -23.14% | 26.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXI and EUFN is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2010 | 0.53 |
The correlation between FXI and EUFN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
FXI vs. EUFN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXI
EUFN
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Technology
Energy
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FXI
EUFN
Consumer Cyclical
FXI
EUFN
Communication Services
FXI
EUFN
-
Technology
FXI
EUFN
Energy
FXI
EUFN
-
Industrials
FXI
EUFN
Basic Materials
FXI
EUFN
-
Healthcare
FXI
EUFN
-
Real Estate
FXI
EUFN
-
Consumer Defensive
FXI
EUFN
-
Utilities
FXI
EUFN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXI vs. EUFN — Risk / Return Rank
FXI
EUFN
FXI vs. EUFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXI | EUFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.23 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 1.79 | -1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 6.24 | -6.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXI vs. EUFN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, which is greater than EUFN's maximum drawdown of -53.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXI and EUFN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXI | EUFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.68% | -53.25% | -19.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.03% | -14.77% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.72% | -15.95% | -12.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.94% | -35.15% | -19.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.81% | -53.25% | -7.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.42% | -0.10% | -27.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.21% | -14.53% | -16.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.66% | 4.23% | +3.43% |
Volatility
FXI vs. EUFN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) is 6.22%, while iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that FXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUFN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXI | EUFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 6.96% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.30% | 17.05% | -2.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.90% | 20.17% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.67% | 21.88% | +9.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.64% | 24.53% | +3.11% |
FXI vs. EUFN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXI has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than EUFN's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXI vs. EUFN - Dividend Comparison
FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than EUFN's 3.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUFN iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 3.41% | 3.57% | 5.36% | 5.00% | 4.24% | 4.15% | 1.38% | 4.55% | 6.48% | 3.04% | 4.03% | 3.65% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.62% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXI and EUFN have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EUFN has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to FXI (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXI dropped -72.68% vs EUFN's -53.25%.
On 10-year performance, EUFN leads with 13.48% vs 3.13% for FXI. On fees, EUFN is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, FXI has been the lower-risk option at 6.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EUFN has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EUFN is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.
EUFN has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 2.62% for FXI.
FXI is categorized as China Equities, while EUFN is Financials Equities. FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index, while EUFN tracks MSCI Europe Financials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FXI and 0.48% for EUFN.
EUFN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXI and EUFN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer