FXF vs. IDMO
FXF (Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust) and IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXF is a Currency fund tracking the Swiss Franc, while IDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXF returned 1.10%/yr vs 12.47%/yr for IDMO. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FXF charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IDMO.
Performance
FXF vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXF achieves a -2.40% return, which is significantly lower than IDMO's 8.27% return. Over the past 10 years, FXF has underperformed IDMO with an annualized return of 1.10%, while IDMO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.47% annualized return.
FXF
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- 6M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 1Y
- -1.61%
- 3Y*
- 1.73%
- 5Y*
- 2.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.10%
IDMO
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 21.68%
- 3Y*
- 24.84%
- 5Y*
- 15.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.47%
FXF vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | -2.40% | 14.04% | -7.46% | 9.63% | -2.29% | -4.08% | 8.18% | 0.32% | -2.01% | 3.31% |
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 8.27% | 42.17% | 12.79% | 20.16% | -12.03% | 14.31% | 22.01% | 26.09% | -16.66% | 29.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXF and IDMO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012 | 0.18 |
Over the past year, FXF and IDMO have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXF vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank
FXF
IDMO
FXF vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXF | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.22 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 1.77 | -2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | 6.94 | -7.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXF vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXF drawdown since its inception was -35.58%, smaller than the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXF and IDMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXF | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.58% | -39.38% | +3.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.72% | -12.31% | +5.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.52% | -12.65% | +4.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | -27.07% | +15.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.04% | -31.34% | +16.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.33% | -3.93% | -16.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.83% | -9.70% | -11.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 3.13% | -0.30% |
Volatility
FXF vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) is 2.02%, while Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a volatility of 5.93%. This indicates that FXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXF | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.02% | 5.93% | -3.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.76% | 16.86% | -11.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.44% | 18.53% | -11.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.32% | 18.14% | -9.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 17.89% | -10.32% |
FXF vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXF vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison
FXF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 3.69% | 3.71% | 2.24% | 2.89% | 3.66% | 1.81% | 1.63% | 2.78% | 3.27% | 3.08% | 2.18% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXF and IDMO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDMO has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to FXF (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXF dropped -35.58% vs IDMO's -39.38%.
On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 12.47% vs 1.10% for FXF. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FXF has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 12.47% return vs 1.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FXF.
IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 0.00% for FXF.
FXF is categorized as Currency, while IDMO is Momentum. FXF tracks Swiss Franc, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FXF and 0.25% for IDMO.
IDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXF and IDMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer