FXF vs. EEMV
FXF (Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust) and EEMV (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXF is a Currency fund tracking the Swiss Franc, while EEMV is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXF returned 1.05%/yr vs 7.04%/yr for EEMV. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FXF charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EEMV.
Performance
FXF vs. EEMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXF achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly lower than EEMV's 20.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FXF has underperformed EEMV with an annualized return of 1.05%, while EEMV has yielded a comparatively higher 7.04% annualized return.
FXF
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- 1.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.71%
- 5Y*
- 2.14%
- 10Y*
- 1.05%
EEMV
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- 7.71%
- YTD
- 20.09%
- 6M
- 21.21%
- 1Y
- 27.78%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 7.04%
FXF vs. EEMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | -0.56% | 14.04% | -7.46% | 9.63% | -2.29% | -4.08% | 8.18% | 0.32% | -2.01% | 3.31% |
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 20.09% | 13.45% | 7.98% | 7.75% | -13.94% | 5.05% | 6.90% | 7.83% | -5.81% | 27.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXF and EEMV is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.20 |
The correlation between FXF and EEMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXF vs. EEMV — Risk / Return Rank
FXF
EEMV
FXF vs. EEMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXF | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.39 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 3.03 | -2.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.64 | 10.90 | -10.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXF vs. EEMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXF drawdown since its inception was -35.58%, which is greater than EEMV's maximum drawdown of -31.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXF and EEMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXF | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.58% | -31.56% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.97% | -9.22% | +4.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.52% | -12.47% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | -21.90% | +9.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.04% | -31.56% | +16.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.83% | 0.00% | -18.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.83% | -7.96% | -12.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 2.56% | -0.27% |
Volatility
FXF vs. EEMV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) is 1.84%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) has a volatility of 8.16%. This indicates that FXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXF | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.84% | 8.16% | -6.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.53% | 13.51% | -7.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.42% | 14.67% | -7.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.33% | 12.22% | -3.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 13.99% | -6.42% |
FXF vs. EEMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXF vs. EEMV - Dividend Comparison
FXF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 3.07% | 2.65% | 3.50% | 2.75% | 1.93% | 2.14% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.46% | 2.34% | 2.79% | 2.55% |
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXF and EEMV have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMV has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to FXF (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXF dropped -35.58% vs EEMV's -31.56%.
On 10-year performance, EEMV leads with 7.04% vs 1.05% for FXF. On fees, EEMV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FXF has been the lower-risk option at 1.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EEMV has performed better with a 7.04% return vs 1.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EEMV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FXF.
EEMV has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 0.00% for FXF.
FXF is categorized as Currency, while EEMV is Asia Pacific Equities. FXF tracks Swiss Franc, while EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FXF and 0.25% for EEMV.
EEMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXF and EEMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer