FXF vs. BUFR
FXF (Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust) and BUFR (FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXF is a Currency fund tracking the Swiss Franc, while BUFR is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. FXF is passively managed, while BUFR is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FXF returned 1.83%/yr vs 9.55%/yr for BUFR. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FXF charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFR.
Performance
FXF vs. BUFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXF achieves a -3.50% return, which is significantly lower than BUFR's 6.48% return.
FXF
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- 6M
- -4.81%
- YTD
- -3.50%
- 1Y
- -3.38%
- 3Y*
- 1.52%
- 5Y*
- 1.83%
- 10Y*
- 1.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.60%
BUFR
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 5.68%
- YTD
- 6.48%
- 1Y
- 12.42%
- 3Y*
- 12.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $41.80M | $42.66M | $45.08M | |
| $2.99M | $3.23M | $5.41M |
FXF vs. BUFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | -3.50% | 14.04% | -7.46% | 9.63% | -2.29% | -4.08% | 2.94% |
BUFR FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF | 6.48% | 12.44% | 14.68% | 19.63% | -7.57% | 11.88% | 6.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXF and BUFR is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2020 | 0.20 |
The correlation between FXF and BUFR shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (3 years) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXF vs. BUFR — Risk / Return Rank
FXF
BUFR
FXF vs. BUFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) and FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXF | BUFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.37 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 2.78 | -3.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | 14.53 | -15.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXF vs. BUFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXF drawdown since its inception was -35.58%, which is greater than BUFR's maximum drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXF and BUFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXF | BUFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.58% | -13.73% | -21.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.15% | -4.61% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.52% | -12.81% | +4.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | -13.73% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.23% | -0.90% | -20.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.83% | -2.05% | -18.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 0.88% | +2.10% |
Volatility
FXF vs. BUFR - Volatility Comparison
Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) has a higher volatility of 1.75% compared to FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR) at 1.58%. This indicates that FXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXF | BUFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.75% | 1.58% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.46% | 5.26% | +0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.39% | 6.66% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.31% | 10.47% | -2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 10.16% | -2.59% |
FXF vs. BUFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXF vs. BUFR - Dividend Comparison
Neither FXF nor BUFR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFR FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXF and BUFR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXF has higher volatility (1.75%) compared to BUFR (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXF dropped -35.58% vs BUFR's -13.73%.
On 5-year performance, BUFR leads with 9.55% vs 1.83% for FXF. On fees, FXF is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, BUFR has been the lower-risk option at 1.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BUFR has performed better with a 9.55% return vs 1.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FXF is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFR.
FXF and BUFR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
FXF is categorized as Currency, while BUFR is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FXF and 0.95% for BUFR.
BUFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXF and BUFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer