FXC.L vs. CNAA.L
FXC.L (iShares China Large Cap UCITS) and CNAA.L (Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR) are both China Equities funds - FXC.L tracks the MSCI China NR USD while CNAA.L tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXC.L returned 1.36%/yr vs 4.08%/yr for CNAA.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXC.L charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CNAA.L.
Performance
FXC.L vs. CNAA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FXC.L is traded in GBp, while CNAA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CNAA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXC.L achieves a -10.56% return, which is significantly lower than CNAA.L's 4.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FXC.L has underperformed CNAA.L with an annualized return of 1.36%, while CNAA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 4.08% annualized return.
FXC.L
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- 6M
- -12.88%
- YTD
- -10.56%
- 1Y
- -7.61%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- -2.43%
- 10Y*
- 1.36%
CNAA.L
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- -6.86%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 4.25%
- 1Y
- 23.83%
- 3Y*
- 8.50%
- 5Y*
- -0.89%
- 10Y*
- 4.08%
FXC.L vs. CNAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXC.L iShares China Large Cap UCITS | -10.56% | 19.76% | 32.64% | -18.31% | -11.02% | -19.42% | 6.78% | 9.46% | -9.68% | 20.11% |
CNAA.L Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR | 4.25% | 17.14% | 12.85% | -18.48% | -17.18% | 4.19% | 38.58% | 31.66% | -26.27% | 11.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXC.L and CNAA.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2014 | 0.67 |
The correlation between FXC.L and CNAA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.68 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FXC.L vs. CNAA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXC.L
CNAA.L
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
FXC.L
CNAA.L
Consumer Cyclical
FXC.L
CNAA.L
Communication Services
FXC.L
CNAA.L
Technology
FXC.L
CNAA.L
Energy
FXC.L
CNAA.L
Basic Materials
FXC.L
CNAA.L
Industrials
FXC.L
CNAA.L
Healthcare
FXC.L
CNAA.L
Real Estate
FXC.L
CNAA.L
Consumer Defensive
FXC.L
CNAA.L
Utilities
FXC.L
CNAA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXC.L vs. CNAA.L — Risk / Return Rank
FXC.L
CNAA.L
FXC.L vs. CNAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large Cap UCITS (FXC.L) and Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR (CNAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXC.L | CNAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.24 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 2.61 | -2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.78 | 8.14 | -8.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXC.L vs. CNAA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXC.L drawdown since its inception was -72.82%, which is greater than CNAA.L's maximum drawdown of -50.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXC.L and CNAA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXC.L | CNAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.82% | -50.93% | -21.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.05% | -9.52% | -12.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.93% | -26.66% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.36% | -42.50% | -1.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.62% | -45.04% | -9.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.19% | -15.29% | -11.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.62% | -25.69% | +8.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.72% | 3.06% | +6.66% |
Volatility
FXC.L vs. CNAA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares China Large Cap UCITS (FXC.L) is 5.95%, while Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR (CNAA.L) has a volatility of 8.64%. This indicates that FXC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNAA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXC.L | CNAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.95% | 8.64% | -2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.75% | 14.64% | -1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.29% | 18.99% | -0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.18% | 21.83% | +6.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.99% | 22.33% | +2.66% |
FXC.L vs. CNAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXC.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CNAA.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXC.L vs. CNAA.L - Dividend Comparison
FXC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, while CNAA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNAA.L Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXC.L iShares China Large Cap UCITS | 1.85% | 1.76% | 2.30% | 2.49% | 2.46% | 1.83% | 2.52% | 2.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.32% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXC.L and CNAA.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CNAA.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CNAA.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXC.L.
FXC.L tracks MSCI China NR USD, while CNAA.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FXC.L and 0.35% for CNAA.L.
Find the right allocation for FXC.L and CNAA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer