FXC.L vs. CSPX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares China Large Cap UCITS (FXC.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L).
FXC.L and CSPX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FXC.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Oct 21, 2004. CSPX.L is a passively managed fund by Blackrock Financial Management that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 18, 2010. Both FXC.L and CSPX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FXC.L or CSPX.L.
Correlation
The correlation between FXC.L and CSPX.L is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FXC.L vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FXC.L:
2.08
CSPX.L:
1.91
FXC.L:
2.83
CSPX.L:
2.53
FXC.L:
1.37
CSPX.L:
1.37
FXC.L:
1.16
CSPX.L:
2.60
FXC.L:
6.01
CSPX.L:
11.90
FXC.L:
9.56%
CSPX.L:
2.08%
FXC.L:
27.65%
CSPX.L:
12.92%
FXC.L:
-60.51%
CSPX.L:
-9.49%
FXC.L:
-20.19%
CSPX.L:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXC.L achieves a 14.59% return, which is significantly higher than CSPX.L's 3.47% return.
FXC.L
14.59%
11.85%
38.95%
55.85%
-0.29%
3.25%
CSPX.L
3.47%
2.11%
11.11%
23.91%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FXC.L vs. CSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXC.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FXC.L vs. CSPX.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FXC.L
CSPX.L
FXC.L vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large Cap UCITS (FXC.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FXC.L vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
FXC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, while CSPX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXC.L iShares China Large Cap UCITS | 2.61% | 2.99% | 3.10% | 2.85% | 2.51% | 3.26% | 3.22% | 3.89% | 3.18% | 3.04% | 4.00% | 3.94% |
CSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FXC.L vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXC.L drawdown since its inception was -60.51%, which is greater than CSPX.L's maximum drawdown of -9.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXC.L and CSPX.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FXC.L vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares China Large Cap UCITS (FXC.L) has a higher volatility of 7.02% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) at 3.73%. This indicates that FXC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.