PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWWFX vs. GQRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FWWFX vs. GQRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Worldwide Fund (FWWFX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWWFX achieves a 20.80% return, which is significantly higher than GQRIX's 7.75% return.


FWWFX

1D
1.11%
1M
8.00%
YTD
20.80%
6M
21.02%
1Y
41.13%
3Y*
25.49%
5Y*
12.63%
10Y*
15.08%

GQRIX

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
7.75%
6M
8.32%
1Y
8.03%
3Y*
14.23%
5Y*
9.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWWFX vs. GQRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FWWFX
Fidelity Worldwide Fund
20.80%16.16%27.65%24.96%-25.74%18.49%30.91%13.29%
GQRIX
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares
7.75%0.91%20.18%19.79%-3.64%17.13%14.75%12.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FWWFX and GQRIX is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2019

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between FWWFX and GQRIX has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FWWFX vs. GQRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWWFX
FWWFX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FWWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FWWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

GQRIX
GQRIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
GQRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
GQRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWWFX vs. GQRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Worldwide Fund (FWWFX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FWWFXGQRIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

0.86

+1.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.19

1.29

+1.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.15

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

1.43

+2.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.48

3.02

+12.46

FWWFX vs. GQRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWWFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the GQRIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWWFX and GQRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FWWFXGQRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

0.86

+1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.68

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.71

-0.16

Drawdowns

FWWFX vs. GQRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWWFX drawdown since its inception was -56.54%, which is greater than GQRIX's maximum drawdown of -28.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWWFX and GQRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FWWFXGQRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.54%

-28.86%

-27.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.74%

-5.40%

-6.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.61%

-16.47%

-6.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.72%

-20.29%

-13.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.45%

+3.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-4.91%

-4.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

2.55%

+0.16%

Volatility

FWWFX vs. GQRIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Worldwide Fund (FWWFX) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQRIX) at 2.70%. This indicates that FWWFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FWWFXGQRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

2.70%

+3.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.72%

6.92%

+6.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.39%

8.96%

+8.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.89%

14.67%

+4.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.79%

17.26%

+1.53%

FWWFX vs. GQRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWWFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GQRIX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FWWFX vs. GQRIX - Dividend Comparison

FWWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.55%, more than GQRIX's 7.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FWWFX
Fidelity Worldwide Fund
9.55%11.54%14.64%0.94%6.29%12.76%8.08%4.87%9.63%6.24%1.22%3.38%
GQRIX
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares
7.37%7.94%6.46%1.39%2.99%1.65%0.11%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FWWFX and GQRIX have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FWWFX has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to GQRIX (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWWFX dropped -56.54% vs GQRIX's -28.86%.

FWWFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FWWFX and GQRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer