PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWRG vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FWRG vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc. (FWRG) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWRG achieves a -19.10% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 8.09% return.


FWRG

1D
0.99%
1M
5.72%
YTD
-19.10%
6M
-22.74%
1Y
-18.94%
3Y*
-9.21%
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
8.09%
6M
6.78%
1Y
22.17%
3Y*
20.91%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*
15.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWRG vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FWRG
First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc.
-19.10%-18.97%-7.41%48.56%-19.27%-20.19%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.09%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%11.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FWRG and VOO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FWRG vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWRG
FWRG Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FWRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWRG Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FWRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWRG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWRG vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc. (FWRG) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FWRGVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.33

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.40

2.50

-2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.77

11.08

-11.85

FWRG vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWRG Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWRG and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FWRG vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWRG drawdown since its inception was -60.38%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWRG and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FWRGVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.38%

-33.99%

-26.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.26%

-8.90%

-38.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.38%

-18.69%

-41.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.19%

-3.23%

-48.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.22%

-3.68%

-25.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.57%

2.01%

+22.56%

Volatility

FWRG vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc. (FWRG) has a higher volatility of 18.33% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.75%. This indicates that FWRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FWRGVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.33%

4.75%

+13.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.57%

9.77%

+32.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.91%

12.39%

+41.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.03%

16.91%

+31.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.03%

18.02%

+30.01%

Dividends

FWRG vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FWRG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FWRG
First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FWRG and VOO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FWRG has higher volatility (18.33%) compared to VOO (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWRG dropped -60.38% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FWRG and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer