PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWRG.L vs. NUKL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FWRG.L vs. NUKL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FWRG.L is traded in USD, while NUKL.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the NUKL.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FWRG.L having a 10.64% return and NUKL.DE slightly lower at 10.37%.


FWRG.L

1D
1.78%
1M
1.72%
YTD
10.64%
6M
11.30%
1Y
27.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NUKL.DE

1D
0.98%
1M
-3.00%
YTD
10.37%
6M
9.36%
1Y
38.07%
3Y*
45.77%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWRG.L vs. NUKL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FWRG.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc
10.64%13.84%20.11%8,531.38%
NUKL.DE
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A
10.37%71.04%30.14%26.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FWRG.L and NUKL.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023

0.48

The correlation between FWRG.L and NUKL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FWRG.L vs. NUKL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWRG.L
FWRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FWRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

NUKL.DE
NUKL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NUKL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUKL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUKL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
NUKL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUKL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWRG.L vs. NUKL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FWRG.LNUKL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.22

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

1.90

+1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.15

4.64

+10.50

FWRG.L vs. NUKL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the NUKL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWRG.L and NUKL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FWRG.L vs. NUKL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWRG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.87%, smaller than the maximum NUKL.DE drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWRG.L and NUKL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FWRG.LNUKL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.87%

-34.33%

+15.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.14%

-27.96%

+20.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

-13.38%

+11.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-7.21%

+4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

11.46%

-9.65%

Volatility

FWRG.L vs. NUKL.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) is 3.65%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE) has a volatility of 11.43%. This indicates that FWRG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUKL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FWRG.LNUKL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

11.43%

-7.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.11%

29.57%

-21.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.63%

42.40%

-31.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4,484.46%

34.71%

+4,449.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4,484.46%

34.71%

+4,449.75%

FWRG.L vs. NUKL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWRG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NUKL.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

FWRG.L vs. NUKL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FWRG.L nor NUKL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FWRG.L and NUKL.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FWRG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FWRG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for NUKL.DE.

FWRG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while NUKL.DE is Energy Equities. FWRG.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while NUKL.DE tracks MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FWRG.L and 0.55% for NUKL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FWRG.L and NUKL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer