FWRG.L vs. MIST.L
FWRG.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc) and MIST.L (PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation) are both Global Equities funds - FWRG.L tracks the FTSE All-World Index while MIST.L tracks the PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FWRG.L returned 17.95%/yr vs 5.81%/yr for MIST.L. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
FWRG.L vs. MIST.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FWRG.L is traded in USD, while MIST.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MIST.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FWRG.L achieves a 10.88% return, which is significantly higher than MIST.L's 1.66% return.
FWRG.L
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- YTD
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 22.81%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MIST.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- 5.81%
- 5Y*
- 2.48%
- 10Y*
- —
FWRG.L vs. MIST.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FWRG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc | 10.88% | 13.84% | 20.11% | 8,531.38% |
MIST.L PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation | 1.66% | 12.50% | 3.77% | 3.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between FWRG.L and MIST.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FWRG.L vs. MIST.L — Risk / Return Rank
FWRG.L
MIST.L
FWRG.L vs. MIST.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) and PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation (MIST.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FWRG.L | MIST.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.11 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 0.96 | +2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.26 | 2.13 | +10.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FWRG.L vs. MIST.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FWRG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.87%, smaller than the maximum MIST.L drawdown of -26.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWRG.L and MIST.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FWRG.L | MIST.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.87% | -26.32% | +7.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.14% | -4.21% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.87% | -7.89% | -10.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.11% | -1.45% | -0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -5.96% | +3.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 1.91% | -0.05% |
Volatility
FWRG.L vs. MIST.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.13% compared to PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation (MIST.L) at 1.69%. This indicates that FWRG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIST.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FWRG.L | MIST.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 1.69% | +1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.52% | 4.92% | +3.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.92% | 6.53% | +4.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4,417.24% | 8.59% | +4,408.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4,417.24% | 8.91% | +4,408.33% |
Dividends
FWRG.L vs. MIST.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FWRG.L nor MIST.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FWRG.L and MIST.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FWRG.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while MIST.L tracks PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and PIMCO.
Find the right allocation for FWRG.L and MIST.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer