FWRG.L vs. G500.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

FWRG.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc) and G500.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)) are both Global Equities funds from Invesco - FWRG.L tracks the FTSE All-World Index while G500.L tracks the Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FWRG.L returned 17.95%/yr vs 21.04%/yr for G500.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FWRG.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for G500.L.

Performance

FWRG.L vs. G500.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) (G500.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FWRG.L is traded in USD, while G500.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the G500.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FWRG.L having a 10.88% return and G500.L slightly lower at 10.60%.

FWRG.L

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: -1.13%
• 6M: 9.15%
• YTD: 10.88%
• 1Y: 22.81%
• 3Y*: 17.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

G500.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.92%
• 6M: 10.32%
• YTD: 10.60%
• 1Y: 22.54%
• 3Y*: 21.04%
• 5Y*: 11.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWRG.L vs. G500.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FWRG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc	10.88%	13.84%	20.11%	8,531.38%
G500.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)	10.60%	26.32%	22.89%	10.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FWRG.L and G500.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023	0.58

The correlation between FWRG.L and G500.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FWRG.L vs. G500.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWRG.L

FWRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 81
FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FWRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FWRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FWRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FWRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

G500.L

G500.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
G500.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
G500.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
G500.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
G500.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
G500.L Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWRG.L vs. G500.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) (G500.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FWRG.L	G500.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	1.53	+0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	2.30	+0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.27	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.18	1.82	+1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.26	6.85	+5.41

FWRG.L vs. G500.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the G500.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWRG.L and G500.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FWRG.L vs. G500.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWRG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.87%, smaller than the maximum G500.L drawdown of -39.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWRG.L and G500.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FWRG.L	G500.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.87%	-39.54%	+20.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.14%	-12.56%	+5.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.87%	-17.75%	-1.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-39.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.11%	-0.10%	-2.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.23%	-8.08%	+5.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	3.34%	-1.48%

Volatility

FWRG.L vs. G500.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) is 3.13%, while Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) (G500.L) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that FWRG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than G500.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FWRG.L	G500.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.13%	3.57%	-0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.52%	11.66%	-3.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.92%	14.98%	-4.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4,417.24%	20.37%	+4,396.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4,417.24%	20.09%	+4,397.15%

FWRG.L vs. G500.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWRG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than G500.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FWRG.L vs. G500.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FWRG.L nor G500.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FWRG.L and G500.L in my portfolio?

FWRG.L and G500.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FWRG.L or G500.L?

On fees, G500.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FWRG.L or G500.L?

G500.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FWRG.L.

What is the main difference between FWRG.L and G500.L?

FWRG.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while G500.L tracks Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FWRG.L and 0.05% for G500.L.